I dont understand one thing what does she mean by saying that by affecting the victims the message is given to target. Doesn't she understand that the message is loud and clear 'We will destroy you for Jehad' that means they can use nuclear weapons against anyone without thinking as rationally as she thinks.
I dont think that terrorist will not use it because the reason for which they used will be destroyed. This is because their reason and intention to put in simple words is 'We will destroy you in name of Jihad' nothing less nothing more.
RE:Comments
by Mayank Agarwal on Feb 05, 2008 09:52 PM Permalink
I would like to bring to notice the Mecca Masjid blast ast year in Hyderabad. The concerned persons behind the attack were Muslims but still that did not deter them from bombing a mosque..that means they are not afraid if it gives wrong signal even to Muslims. I mean this shows that they are not bound to any religion or reason...and hence proves my point.
Why would they bother if the reason for which stands to be destroyed? It is a toy for them which kills even more people than any other toy.
What does she mean by reason? Who else except few in islamic countries and Muslims share sort of sympathy or sponsor the reasons of these terrorists. Infact by being able to use Nuclear weapon they might be able to motivate the demoralised terrorists in different parts of world..who have seen the royal screwing of Al-Qaeda and Taliban in Afghanistan.
RE:Comments
by sam on Feb 05, 2008 09:54 PM Permalink
I am anti pak, but to my understanding she knows the muslim mind better and first time any muslim is speaking truth. I think she is right, terrorist may not want to use nuke because there purpose is to terrorise the population and convert them to islam. If the whole population is annhilated then there ends will not meet. So they will rather use weapos which will kill not more than 50-100 people at a time. If thats not true, then by now you must have seen blasts of very high magnitude killing thousands of people but that has never happened.
RE:Comments
by Mayank Agarwal on Feb 05, 2008 09:57 PM Permalink
Being a muslim does not justify her to give an accurate picture of Terrorists. I dont think ISLAM requires conversion from christians and they even dont expect that. What do you mean by mass killing ?
Have you started seeing deaths of 5-10 people or 50-100 people or 3000 people as peanuts. Do you mean atleast one lakh should be killed in a terrorist strike then you will sit back and say yes but it is still too small compared to world population.
