every single party has been doing it. either in the name of majority or minority or regional cause, or linguistic cause. there's only divide and rule adopted by all political parties. they party at our expense
RE:why only raj thackery
by on Feb 05, 2008 01:14 AM Permalink
Bombay has progressed not because of Marathi people, but because of outsiders, the Hindi speaking states are the least developed. Bombay does not belong to Maharashtra, but to India as a whole, Marathi people don't have any extra rights over other Indians, they should be thankful for the cosmopolitian people of Bombay, people of Bihar and UP have set up huts all over Bombay, by bribing the police, the BMC, ruled by the BJP and Shiv Sena.
If people of India, are not allowed to stay in Bombay, or any place in India, does the rule not apply to Indians working and staying in US, UK and all over the world, should they be not hunted out of foreign lands.
Apart from speading hatred, changing names of places, creating riots, looting and distroying properties of others what has the Shiv Sena, the MNS or the Thakre family contributed to Maharashtra or Bombay. does the city belong to them only, just because it is a rich cashing cow. How many crores have the Thakerays made from the city, are they not provided free security out of public money, and ill treat the same public.
