one should know that 95% industrialist are non marathi. 90% bollywood filmstar are non marathi.65% commercial organisations belong to non marathis. It is the non marathis who are giving livelyhood to marathis. Raj Thackrey should learn from west bengal. What they did to non bengalis in sixties made all the big group shift their Ho to bombay and the now see the state of the so called commercial centre of india. India is one and every one compliments the other and then only we are moving ahead. By dividing the society on the basis of region/caste we are not thinking for the betterment of the country. However I feel this remark is only for the galleries and no educated or sensible person would appreciate Raj's remarks.
RE:mumbai without non marathis
by manoj kumar on Feb 05, 2008 10:54 PM Permalink
Samyukta Maharashtra movement was a waste. It doesn't really makes much difference whether Mumbai is in Maharashtra or in Gujarat or its a union territory
RE:RE:mumbai without non marathis
by Creative Online on Feb 07, 2008 01:52 AM Permalink
belong ki spelling seekh leti, to tumhara state tumko hi naukari de deta.. lekin abhi woh bahar ke logon ko bulata hai.
RE:mumbai without non marathis
by Abhijit Dongre! on Feb 04, 2008 08:53 PM Permalink
Just tell me one thing Mr. Khemka .... if non marathis are that good why don't they go to their own state and prosper there? It's only because of friendly and desciplined nature of maharashtrians that maharashtra is way ahead than others and not because of non-marathis.
Only development in maharastra is bombay- The city developed by GUJJUS!!! and you gathis protested in 1960 and burned killed Gujjus.Shiv sena commited atrocites.NOw surat and ahmedabad are more powerful and in comign days,bombay will sperate zone.Till recently in early 2000 all stations name were in gujarati,hindi and english but dogs like thackeray cant see propserity.
And talking about north indian,They have played their part in developing city.
RE:mumbai without non marathis
by nikita rane on Feb 05, 2008 10:44 PM Permalink
this city is ours not ur.we have problem. in sabko leke jao.khudke city me rahne ko nahi hota to mar jaao. hamare upar ka boz to niklega.
RE:mumbai without non marathis
by jihu on Feb 05, 2008 03:44 AM Permalink
how have unskilled labourers from UP/bihar etc, contributed to maharastra? they rely on menial jobs or stealing,
RE:mumbai without non marathis
by Rakesh on Feb 05, 2008 12:36 PM Permalink
yeh log employment market ki maa behen kardiya hain if iam to get rs.100/- for a work this people will work for rs.20/- for the same work how will i survive now. because in their state no one wants them their and they have not even seen rs.10/- ka note. the fight is against the rising number of slums how they shit on the railway tracks and have come up with slums in the kalwa sector we have to tie a hankie for travelling from their
RE:mumbai without non marathis
by Creative Online on Feb 07, 2008 01:51 AM Permalink
the same is the case, when Indian firms are outsourcing at lower cost. According to your logic, that is also wrong. Or the ways Americans behave like losers is right.
RE:RE:mumbai without non marathis
by manoj kumar on Feb 05, 2008 10:34 PM Permalink
They shoot you, you have a problem. They do hard work and earn their bread, you have a problem.
