I am apalled at the biased attitude of some channels against Hindus. They seem to forget that the agitation was started by the Kashmiri Muslims against the allocation of land and they held the state to ransom for a good two weeks and without any dialogue, consultation or thought process the Government revoked the land allocation order. Even after this was done the protestors including Yasin Malik burst fire crackers and celebrated their so called Victory against the Hindus. Now Yasin Malik is pleading for peace and harmony and non communalisation of the issue. It wasn't the Hindu's that started this in the first place. The entire media is showing that the people of Jammu are at fault and they are illegitimate in their demands. If the land is already being used by the worshippers then what is the problem of the Kashmiri muslims to formally allocate the land to them. Why did the create such a big hue and cry in the first place? While Omar Abdullah some tv channels have showered praises for his so called "patriotic" speech in parliament (which I totally disagree with) can buy land and homes anywhere in India he is against giving land for a Hindu shrine in Kashmir. Is this India? Are we begging for land in our own country. Omar abdullah has two houses in "India" one in Bangalore and one in Delhi, but he vehemently opposes allocating the land to a Hindu shrine, HYPOCRITES HE AND HIS FATHER AND GRANDFATHER Although I'm Catholic I am greatly moved by the ways the Hi
RE:Media Biased against Hindus
by Neptune on Aug 07, 2008 11:25 AM Permalink
Although I'm Catholic I am greatly moved by the ways the Hindu's are being treated in this country by the Government and this is being done merely for votes. But now even the media seems biased against the hindus by saying that their agitation is damaging the secular fabric of our country.
