Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Why
by muppala srikar on Aug 06, 2008 03:05 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Why what is wrong if Local people deny their land to be given away?It is their state and they should be given the option weather to give the land or not.Will any hindu allow a mosque to be newly constructed in their area ? They want to pray their god and be united as they are minority and feeling insecure. Why should we enforce our will upon them and feel they are a treat to us what is wrong in peacefully co existing.They should be pitied upon because they are seen as aliens in their own motherland

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Why
by Biswajit Ghoshal on Aug 06, 2008 03:09 PM   Permalink
first learn - then talk. Hidus allowed many mosques to be constructed upon temples.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Why
by Shanker Shetty on Aug 06, 2008 03:16 PM   Permalink
muppala, its govt land kisiki jaagir nahi

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Why
by muppala srikar on Aug 06, 2008 03:19 PM   Permalink
Think sir then you will understand their is no point in getting angry THINK!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Why
by Rationalist on Aug 06, 2008 03:09 PM   Permalink
It may be their land but not their alone. Nobody is asking for land in Pakistan.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why
by dnl on Aug 06, 2008 03:12 PM   Permalink
True , however we are not talking abt a different country where we are talking abt a land equal to Nehra stadium being given for shelter to pligrims for a period of 3 months.This land is not owned by locals but by the govt of India. Now if we take yr advise then we should not spend even a single paisa on Haj pligramage where huge subsidy is given be it places to stay, air flight etc.... This is supposed to be a secular country where Hindus are treated as minority

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why
by balkrishen pandit on Aug 06, 2008 03:14 PM   Permalink
Are you from some backward third world country, who does not know what the demand is about and who is opposing the cancellation of the land allocation. You yourself say "what is wrong in peacefully co existing" then why were kasmiri pandits forced to move from their mptherland. and for your information it is not their land it is ours as well. If we are refused that land then tomorrow you will be refused a space in any state. You people are so called junk of human rights activists sought of thing who pass acomment that suits their designs and uses different parameters for different sects. If this trend continues more Jammu like situations will arise and people like U will have to look for shelter.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Why
by muppala srikar on Aug 06, 2008 03:21 PM   Permalink
Think sir their is no point in getting angry kindly think then you will understand

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why
by Makkad Man on Aug 06, 2008 03:08 PM   Permalink
Gudda Moosuko

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why
by muppala srikar on Aug 06, 2008 03:11 PM   Permalink
Aloochinchu anna Ardham avvuthundhi

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Why
by balaji sampath on Aug 06, 2008 03:16 PM   Permalink
The land in question is forest land and does not belong to any one in other words it is the State govt land

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why
by srinivas kumar on Aug 06, 2008 03:12 PM   Permalink
Its respect to other people who live in the same country.. Who said its their land. Initially its no mans land and first hindus originated, later muslims overtook them. SO if i see muppala its it hindus land in u r words..

This land allotment will actually benifit muslims..
(1)by increasing their tourism..
(2) By providing employment to the local muslims and helping the relations of the nation

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Why
by SN on Aug 06, 2008 03:10 PM   Permalink
dr.rubaiya syed daughter of mufti mohammed syed lives in chennai, southern india.. do you think she should not live there and own property there because she is not from chennai.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Why
by muppala srikar on Aug 06, 2008 03:18 PM   Permalink
Think sir then u will understand!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why
by Rationalist on Aug 06, 2008 03:26 PM   Permalink
Do'nt you have anything else to say?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Amarnath shrine board members resign