Let us believe in truth, by not getting carried away by emotions and sentiments. It is true that Hindus always claimed history by myths, vandalism, sentiments or emotions, but these necessarily doesn’t constitute any truth keeping any evidences in mind. Ram (Aryan God) never existed, it was total imaginary figure imposed on Dravidians who were original inhabitants of Bharat (India). Aryans were nomads and came to Bharat around 3500 years ago who were basically warrior and aggresive community. These facts have been rightly recorded by Archaeological survey of India. ASI doesn;t work on sentiments or emotion. This kind of agency are suppose to go by evidences, scientific proof and research. ASI has also confirmed Ganesha is also Aryan God, this Ganesha and Rama concept was bought by Aryans from outside. Myth= mithya. If you believe Ram then we can safely believe Spiderman , superman, He-man also to be future god, say after another 200 to 300 years. Ram, Hanuman are all mythological characters formed by Vaidic writers to be imposed on dravidians. By the way the word, Hindu, India is all terminology coined by Britishers. Hindu ism is a word or a common name of 1000s of small , tribal, regional religions of Bharat. Gods of South India are not known in North, and God of Assam are not known in Maharashtra. No wonder there are millions of mythological characters , deities in so called mythologically founded today’s Hinduism. Any person with right mind, with right sense will
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by r patil on Aug 04, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
Prasad ASI and DNA has already disproved Aryan invation Theory.There are no suppoters to these theories any more,not even the hindu hating JNUwallas,you can google this and check.Arya means noble not race.How do you impose an imaginery figure on others ,that to which gives credit to them of building he bridge and winning the war?
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by Prasad Manokaran on Aug 04, 2008 04:02 PM Permalink
Any person with right mind, with right sense will not believe these emootionally charged stories. Western historian and many non-brahmin, non-hindu historian wholly believe Ram and Ramayan has no historical evidences and no antiquity. I apologise for bringing the real facts. Truth must always win, not lies and stories.
RE:RE:ram sethu????????????/
by r patil on Aug 04, 2008 04:16 PM Permalink
Yes Prasad truth must always wins,there is no need to "believe" when facts are available that Ram And Krishna were historical figrues.Whether they were God or not that is irrevant.As in hinduism it is the people decide who and how their God should be.
RE:RE:RE:ram sethu????????????/
by kundan kumar on Aug 04, 2008 04:27 PM Permalink
you don't know about the origin of hiduism steal expressing ur useless thoughts............
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by kundan kumar on Aug 04, 2008 04:20 PM Permalink
how can u say that what u r telling is truth???????? u must put the evidence in ur support.
RE:ram sethu????????????/
by iluvtaj on Aug 04, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
All this shows how much ILLITERATE you are and ALSO that you do not know much about our GREAT INDIA (MAHAN BHARAT).
Try to gain some knowledge on what religion means. Regarding PROOFS, ASI and british too conducted some survey and found some good historical evidences, but finally all this need lot of MONEY and people to prove things, which unfortunately we do not have.
It is easy to ask and tell SILLY things like you have written.
Forget about RAM and other gods, religion etc. Do you know the names of your ancestors and details of your clan/history(only last 500 years)?
