Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Nuclear Deal and future source of energy
by abboral boral on Aug 02, 2008 06:20 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

This deal is considered as 2nd economic liberisation initiated by Dr Manmohan Singh in 2008 .The 1st one was in 1991 initiated by the same person as FM under able leadership of late PM P.V.narsimha rao .In 1991 the same left parties with other janta dal played against and now getting the fruit after 17 years .In 2008 same Leftist along with Bjp work against the deal but failed ,but but but they will get the fruit after 10 years again when entire India will be illuminated right from 7 lakh village to 500 town and cities with abundant of electricity .When France started nuclear power in 1971 they had only 2% uses of nuclear power but they now they uses 65% of their energy from nuclear power .So it took 38 years for them to achieve the target .India will start now and will acheive 40 % of nuclear energy in 2050 only .We must understand that by 2050 entire fossil fuel will be vanished from the earth so nuclear ,solar ,bio ,wind energy will be bone of contention .Dr manmohan has seen the vision because he is not a politician but a visionary for India

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Nuclear Deal and future source of energy
by Kris on Aug 03, 2008 12:00 AM   Permalink
Get off your chillum friend. Your post is nothing but a fantasy.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Nuclear Deal and future source of energy
by abboral boral on Aug 03, 2008 12:37 PM   Permalink
Was 1991 liberisation a fantasy my dear friend .What India has acheived after 17 years of liberisation ,just see
1.In 1991 our steel production was only 12 million tons a year that too by PSU and Govt sector only and that too after 60 years of closed economy ,Q economy and economy of beurocracy .And now in 2008 our steel productions are 45 million tons by PVT and PSU .TISCO a private player of last 100 years could acheived land mark M&A of CORUS Steel co ,former British Steel co and made 24 million ton a year that too 100 years of golami by British and Indian closed golami economy .Was it possible with out liberisation
2. What a telephone revoulution ?You can talk with just Rs 1 to anywhere in India
3. Was it possible now a days you are writing so easily in internet with out liberisation
4. France , Japan are running fastest train in the world of 350 km per hr.
5. all our heavy Industries are becoming sick due to no electricity availavle
6. Corruption which was all most 100% upto 1991 ,Now it has been reduced to only 55% .
7. All ready most of states are reeling under shortage of power .
8. How you will acheive 10 % GDP growth with out power
9. Do you want to live in reality of no power , no Industries, no food ,with out power ?where our fantasy will be a reality with in 10 years with this nuclear power deal .The countries who have shut their reactor ,it is due to shortage of uranium only and there is no agreement with this countries with NSG .Think properly

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Nuclear Deal and future source of energy
by Varghese Baby on Aug 04, 2008 06:04 PM   Permalink
Good post, friend ....

The Left & BJP are in dark now and always as usual

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Nuclear Deal and future source of energy
by Srikanth on Aug 04, 2008 06:10 PM   Permalink
Great to see your religious affinity Varghese

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Nuclear Deal and future source of energy
by shivkumar on Aug 04, 2008 06:10 PM   Permalink
Some people are die hard cynics. They do not want to be convinced by any sorts of argument even if the majority are for something they distrust or disbelieve. They have fixated ideas and to accept other's views is horrendous for them. The Left party is such a party and there are more in the opposition who just want to oppose for the sake of opposing anything. We should learn a lesson or two from the West. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton went around the USA campaigning but when Hillary started to lose, she at once accepted it and extended full support to Obama's ideas. In the past also we have seen that the defeated party leaders swear to stand by their victorious leaders. But here, we have leaders who will shout foul after they get defeated and go on opposing every move of the ruling party. They will be always on the look out to topple the government. Never they have any agreement with the ruling party in any respect. We can see from the debates or talk shows in television channels how these political leaders always accuse the other of mismanagement of anything from economy to terrorism. No one agrees on any point and the points of debate is left unresolved.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Nuclear Deal and future source of energy
by Srikanth on Aug 04, 2008 06:09 PM   Permalink
In both the cases, MMS has done the same dealing with JMM and other parties. Hats off MMS.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
What N-deal really means for some