The main reason the Maoists won is because they terrorized the electorate into voting for them by issuing the following warning:
If you do not vote for us we will resume the civil war and ruin your lives and that of your sons and daughters and you will never be rid of our constant attacks. We will continue to kid nap your children to serve as child soldiers for the war. We will continue to raid your houses and steal your savings.
The electorate of Nepal submitted meekly to this infernal threat.
I hope in the coming few years there is a gathering storm of the forces of the RIGHT and the NEPALESE ARMY along with the INDIAN ARMY oust these charlatans and criminals from Kathmandu and establish democratic rule in NEPAL.
RE:The Whole analysis is crap.
by satyarthi on Apr 18, 2008 08:18 PM Permalink
As such Modi was/ is quite popular in Gujrat. There was no need to terrorise a particular section of votrs in Gujrat (8% muslims). Maoist campaign for power in Nepal cannot be compared with any state election in India. Even in west bengal marxists use a softer variety of threat, viz., displacement of bagardars (share croppers) from unauthorised lands.
RE:The Whole analysis is crap.
by satyarthi on Apr 18, 2008 11:28 PM Permalink
Baburam Bhattarai, had warned that if the Maoists lost the election, it would take them "ten minutes" to lay claim to Kathmandu.
RE:The Whole analysis is crap.
by satyarthi on Apr 18, 2008 07:43 PM Permalink
Maosit win in Nepal was nothing but a fromality; where world led by USA indirectly approved and accepted control of arms militia over Nepal.
