Maoist win in Nepal is an outcome of nexus between church and marxism. First they killed the humane king, brought a boozer and subsequently replaced him with a violent crowd. In due course, nepalis will get converted into ......
RE:Nepal per capita income was greater than Bihar, despite that....
by Rasheed Usmani on Apr 18, 2008 05:18 PM Permalink
wah...kya door ki laye ho...what an analysis...great...
RE:Nepal per capita income was greater than Bihar, despite that....
by Power India on Apr 18, 2008 05:33 PM Permalink
Satyarthi should be appointed as Indian diplomat in Nepal. he is as fool as any indian diplomat has ever been in Nepal. Never try to know the reality of peoples' feeling
RE:Nepal per capita income was greater than Bihar, despite that....
by satyarthi on Apr 18, 2008 07:36 PM Permalink
An armed militia can terrorised the people under its influence zone, not others. The nexus between naxals (a variant of marxism) and church is quite estblished. There is nothing new in this analysis. It is a part of an endevour to tame a civilization that is proving too tough despite its apparent weaknesses. Only few patches in Asia remained unconverted.
