Behind the facade of the creamy layer arguement lies the truth that it is only the creamy layers of Dalits and OBCs who can fill the quota. Unfilled quota means it goes to the general pool. Hence this bogus arguement of excluding the creamy layer
RE:Why the Anti-Creamy Layer Arguement is Bogus
by TheOneAndOnly on Apr 14, 2008 05:47 PM Permalink
And the Wrath Against the Argument is all about the Fact That, But for the Reservations, These Creamy Layers Cannot ever ever raise to the Requisite Levels of Merit AND the Whole Argument of Suppression And Thus backwardness, Will Simply get Disproved within No Time.
Which would obviously also mean that The Backwardness is inherent And NO Suppression Really Existed.
RE:Why the Anti-Creamy Layer Arguement is Bogus
by Sincere Citizen on Apr 14, 2008 05:37 PM Permalink
So whats wrong in that ? or do you think that the reserved categories should never improve their academic excellence ?
This argument is much better but frankly the entire reservation thing itself is bogus.
It has wrong victims and wrong targets and an completely wrong method to bring about social equality.
RE:RE:Why the Anti-Creamy Layer Arguement is Bogus
by SIDDHARTH MAZUMDAR on Apr 14, 2008 05:52 PM Permalink
this is exactly the point that anti quota people are talking about. i do not get it ,if you are not poor, if the people belonging to creamy layer have recieved proper education from best of college, school why should they be given special preferances ??the fact is that theactually backward dont even complete there secondary education so what good is a reservation at post graduate level going to do. the government should focus on primary and secondary education rather than go for divisive politics. if such politics exists then the country will go to dogs because merit will have no value and mediocrity will reign..
