His first conclusion says how rish valmiki,and all other sri gurus and saints be false and others be true?Yes this is what you are supposed to prove?How can you presuppose an assumption to be true when your intended objective itself is to prove that assumption? Oh Officer!! Learn some fundamentals rules of reasoning before venture out to prove something
RE:what kind of article is this?
by JB on Apr 15, 2008 03:45 AM Permalink
You get it all wrong. Author has provided the credentials seem difficult to overlook & ignore and warned about some of the so called biased research in the past which has lead us to make up a very different mind set to stir the controversy now.
And looking at the vast historical literature (which forms a kind of only evidence as of now as nothing physical sort of evidence could be found for a matter of very ancient age , take any character even younger than that age Moses, Jesus etc). author suggests just don't blindly ignore it.
