i have not as well researched as author..(well researched doesnt always mean u are saying the right thing, you could be highly biased)..
whether ram disowned sita or now, whether he killed bali from behind or not , whether he killed someone for begin a shudra or not..the fact is that hindus have believed and accepeted this for thousands of years..which makes it true. and shows us the dangers of idolosing a person thousands of years ago without questioning.
this is the same as whether mohammed had sex with a 9 year old girl or not, whether he brutally killed people or not as told in hadiths..the fact that muslims accepted it for thousand years makes it true and again shows the dangers of idolising a person..
RE:hindu equivalent of zakir naik ??
by Mayala Fakir on Apr 14, 2008 03:00 PM Permalink
You should tone down a little comrade... your bile is too strong :)
RE:hindu equivalent of zakir naik ??
by siddhartha on Apr 14, 2008 03:12 PM Permalink
diplomatically ? ... it was a very 'rationally' and non offensively put statement...i dont see how u can tone it down any further without taking away the intended effect...
problem with indians is they 'try' too be diplomatic all the time..sometimes u justn eed to call a spade a spade..
i dint make anything up, i stated exectly what people believe in their mind, i dint abuse curse or look down upon anyone.
and i tried to be objective in my assessment..
dumb pseudos above me...(not thats offensive and meant to be so)
RE:hindu equivalent of zakir naik ??
by siddhartha on Apr 14, 2008 03:03 PM Permalink
i dont like communists either :)..i just have an independent thinking mnd unlike you.
RE:hindu equivalent of zakir naik ??
by Karthi Keyan on Apr 14, 2008 03:24 PM Permalink
siddhartha, we have our own faith in heart. Those who says wrong about Mohammed {PUBH} are his criticizers, we believe in Koran and its teachings. We do not worship Mohammed, Mohammed is the messenger to Allah the Almighty. He never taught us dangers he showed an effective way of life and all these years we found no issues or problems with our faith or religion. The problems which you and we are facing is the terrorism by few who didn't understood the Holy Koran properly.
RE:hindu equivalent of zakir naik ??
by Ankit p modi on Apr 14, 2008 03:37 PM Permalink
Totally agree with you! Fanaticism is nothing but fooling yourself. god is thing to be kept in heart and not on sleeve/head/beard.
Unfortunately, people don't realize, mulla's / so called pandits/ religious leaders are spreading their views on religion to everyone. People who ask WHY? and want reasoning are discouraged. you do that when u resist change, which is a sign of a blocked mind. A blocked mind has no space for knowledge for it. A book/ religion can not stop evolution for ever? can it. Change is inevitable. Religion is for inner self, whats shown outside, is for pure show. Please realize hidden power/social politics behind religious groups. Groups are formed by insecure people. Religion should be as open as choosing clothes, you choose what you believe, and what makes you happy, and not what you inherit. How can we inherit belief? belief comes from our heart/mind. Please awake, fellow country men
RE:RE:hindu equivalent of zakir naik ??
by tichkule bhaskar on Apr 14, 2008 08:20 PM Permalink
Friend Ankit, What you have written, i loved it like a article which is written by Satyapal Singh.Like you i have same opinion.Thanks lot because you have your pure own opinion which i love not depend on anybody, not on any thesis or some thing written.
