There is no point in trying to say that Darwin's theory of evolution is false, unless the writer wants to make a fool out of himself. The earth is around 4 billion years old, but mankind is not 2 billion years old. Overall, the other date of approx. 5000 BC seems more believable for Ramayana rather than the date that the writer tries to give.
RE:This article
by JB on Apr 15, 2008 03:25 AM Permalink
5000 BC is a fabrication casted by researchers like Max Muller to match everything as per the bible. The author has referred to a date in the article as per the interpretation from the Valmiki Ramayana & other excerpts from Mahabharta episodes.
RE:This article
by Pulsar on Apr 15, 2008 02:54 AM Permalink
And what is the writer's problem if Ram is treated as a God? Just because Valmiki treats Ram as human, does it mean everybody should treat Ram as human? The writer is probably more superstitious than the people that he accuses of being so.
RE:RE:This article
by Bhardwaj Velamakanni on Apr 15, 2008 02:59 AM Permalink
He is taking it to the other extremty of the argument .. while those pinkos/commies question the existnce Rama, this man takes the Ramayan period back to millions of years!
RE:RE:This article
by human on Apr 15, 2008 04:10 AM Permalink
Hi Pulsar Iam a doctor myself and I am convinced that Darwins theory of evolution is false and a big scietific fiasco-It does not explain the origin of species nor does it explain the transformation of one species to another-all it probably explains is the adaptability of species to different environments -There is a large bundle of scientific evidence in the world today which says that humans inhabited this planet not thousands of years ago as we are taught in schools but millions of years ago-there is evidence that intelligent humans in organised societies were existing much earlier than modern science believes but got some how wiped out-for a start read Michael Cremos book-Hidden history
