RE:RE:truth exposed
by cooldudelov on Apr 14, 2008 06:45 PM Permalink
these are manipulated books by your for fathers tiger so keep that knowledge to yourself
RE:RE:truth exposed
by mandook on Apr 14, 2008 07:45 PM Permalink
You seem to be a real paper tiger! Hanuman indeed offered to Ram to take him to Lanka and Hanuman also offered to Sita to take her back to Ram from Lanka. Both these offers were rejected by Ram and Sita for valid reasons. Tiger would have licked the feet of Hanuman and agreed to the like offers!! Tiger does not know even one thing about Ramayana: Sita remained in Lanka only for 10 months or less, not twelve years. Ravan, tho an abducter, had some good qualities, for he never touched the women abducted by him by force (unlike the present day rapists, for Tiger's info.) and therefore nothing indecent happened to Sita. Hanuman did not make rama shoot his Twin Brother! What stupid info. Tiger has got, from his own version of Ramayana, perhaps. Rama killed Vali, brother of Sugreeva, not of Hanuman!! Rama was indeed eating meat, he was a Kshatriya and in those days Kshatriyas did eat meat. Nothing wrong. People like tiger should develop their brain, if any, and should not indulge in crass misinformation and untruth.
RE:RE:truth exposed
by Amit Sharma on Apr 14, 2008 06:50 PM Permalink
I think u really need to see an optician ASAP...it wasnt Hanuman's Twin brother,infact Hanuman never had any sibling...so get ur facts rite 1st, Do u know anything bout theory of Karma?Ravan was more intellectual and wise man den Ram...n even Ram knew dat.It was Ravan's Karma(deeds) which spelt doom for him.If Ram had to go with Hanuman'n finish d far sooner s u said....Den things wouldnt have happend...d way dey happend...n they were Suppose to happen dat ways.. I dint knew we were debating on Food eating habits of Ram..were we? n bout Ravan's "Devilish things" read Ramyana if u could...or watch it somewhere,Sita Used a fig of Grass to ward of Ravan.....dat was the Power of Purity dat Ravan dint' n couldnt do anything..else..he would have been Fried...
RE:RE:truth exposed
by Rationalist on Apr 14, 2008 07:04 PM Permalink
Firstly good to know that you consider meat eating unpioisly. Also you must understand that Ramayana is a Kaavya and not a history textbook that you take each and every thing literally.
RE:RE:RE:truth exposed
by Amit Sharma on Apr 14, 2008 07:20 PM Permalink
@Rationalist This is the point Author is trying to make ALL of US understand..its not KAVYA(Fiction) If something dint have any proof of its existence bcoz of Due process of Millions of years...U cant term it as Fiction, Things in Ramayan Have had happend, Valmiki wasnt talking in Past/Future...it was written in Present Tense. How did he came out with Pushpak(plane)...u wanna say its Fiction...seeing a plane? Science of those times was as advanced as Modern times, we just lost it all coz our govt. isnt doing anything about it.
