Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
@aditin sengupta
by balaord on Apr 12, 2008 01:41 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Akbar was a emperoror at the age of 14 5 centuries ago?can you imagine a 14 year old governing a small group of kids today?

So dont compare today's age with the age of 14 century women.You can look at the peer reviewed scientific journal I have quoted here

questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=98501236

....since elite women generally married around the age of puberty or even earlier...

..The marriage ceremony itself, which often took place when a girl was twelve years old, and sometimes even earlier...

..While certain biological and even psychological aspects of human de­
velopment may be universal -- although sociologists, psychologists,
and historians debate this -- A study of the lives of elite women in England and France between 1050 and 1300 illustrates this reality...


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:@aditin sengupta
by mujju sss on Apr 12, 2008 01:50 AM   Permalink
aditi im waiting for u , please gimme the proof of wat u said...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:@aditin sengupta
by abdul khan on Apr 12, 2008 01:50 AM   Permalink
aditi were u present when she was raped....

do u have the proof

I agree that its pedophilia....altough it was consensual sex

but laws are different now....times have changed

something which are considered crimes were not crimes in those days

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:@aditin sengupta
by CarrotAndStick on Apr 12, 2008 01:53 AM   Permalink


F@cking someone prepubescent and aged 9 is not just paedophilia. It's statutory rape.

Read up sometime.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:@aditin sengupta
by balaord on Apr 12, 2008 01:48 AM   Permalink
who told Ayesha was abused.They lived the most becautiful live any body could imagine.You neither know Islam nor world history.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@aditin sengupta
by aditi sengupta on Apr 12, 2008 01:53 AM   Permalink
A 9 year old being forced into sex by a 50 something cannot be beautiful!! It is a sexual crime.

Cut to today for a moment. Would you justify a 50 year old man having a sexual relationship with a 9 year old for whatever reason? If yes, then you deserve the rule of islam as outlined by the taliban. If no, you agree that it an abhorrent crime in today's world.

Okay, so your argument is that it should not be labelled a crime 1000 years ago. Ok, granted for a moment. But wait, did somebody not say that he was THE GOD or the prophet of God. Surely prophets and gods cleanse and improve humanity, get rid of the evils. And what do we have our good old prophet doing, carrying on with raping a 9 year old.

So either, he was no God or if he was one, then he surely committed a crime coz he should have known better.

Stop fooling yourself into believing that your cult leader was anything but a cult leader.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:@aditin sengupta
by CarrotAndStick on Apr 12, 2008 01:52 AM   Permalink


Oh yea, a 6-year old being f@cked by a 52-year old "prophet".

My, how beautiful!

LOL!!!

Idiot.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@aditin sengupta
by CarrotAndStick on Apr 12, 2008 01:44 AM   Permalink


HAHAHAHA!!!

Akbar might have nominally become emperor at 14. However, the real person doing the governing was not Akbar, my dear liar Muslim, it was Akbar's regent, the old man Bairam Khan.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:@aditin sengupta
by abdul khan on Apr 12, 2008 01:46 AM   Permalink
FYI Bairam Khan was the regent until Akbar assumed the throne at the age of 14

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@aditin sengupta
by balaord on Apr 12, 2008 01:46 AM   Permalink
hey every king has a advicer.Thats all.Can a 14 year old become a president if he had 50 advisers like Bairam Khan today?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:@aditin sengupta
by CarrotAndStick on Apr 12, 2008 01:50 AM   Permalink


Bairam Khan was not just an advisor.

Akbar was playing with toys at age 13 while Bairam Khan actually ran the empire.

Are you stupid enough to imagine a 13-year old will be able to make decisions on taxation and revenue balance, to run an empire at that age?

If you do, then you certainly are a Muslim, LOL!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@aditin sengupta
by abdul khan on Apr 12, 2008 01:44 AM   Permalink
actually

I cus neevr imagine how a 13 yrd old can administer that many ppl.....cud be an emperor...

I mean I cannot a team leader here at my job..

it shows the maturity and ability some ppl have..


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@aditin sengupta
by CarrotAndStick on Apr 12, 2008 01:45 AM   Permalink


You idiot, Akbar at 13 did nothing as a nominal emperor.

All the governing was done by his old regent, Bairam Khan.

Please don't be an idiot when you can help it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:@aditin sengupta
by balaord on Apr 12, 2008 01:46 AM   Permalink
hey every king has a advicer.Thats all.Can a 14 year old become a president if he had 50 advisers like Bairam Khan today?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:@aditin sengupta
by CarrotAndStick on Apr 12, 2008 01:51 AM   Permalink


Bairam Khan was not just an advisor.

Akbar was playing with toys at age 13 while Bairam Khan actually ran the empire.

Are you stupid enough to imagine a 13-year old will be able to make decisions on taxation and revenue balance, to run an empire at that age?

If you do, then you certainly are a Muslim, LOL!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/apr/11glasgow2.htm