I respect Ambedkar for his achievements. As I read whem Ambedkar first introduced reservations it was only for 20 yrs he said it is more than enough for them to improve. These people who worship Ambedkar I think only uses his name don't go by his ways. Even he did't use reservations.
RE:Ambedkar thought different
by Mulnivasi Indian on Apr 10, 2008 03:47 PM Permalink
There is one community who had enjoying reservation from last 3000 years & the fact is that they are not Indians. FACT NO.1 : Brahmins have created 4 varnas, viz. i)Brahmins,ii)Vyaishyas,iii)Kshtriyas & iv)Kshudras. This has happened 3000 years ago when Brahmins arrived in our country. Before that castism was not found in our country. Castism has created to make make the people slave. In castism Brahmins kept themselves on top (Reserved). They have enjoyed the Reservation for :1) Education, 2) To earn money, 3) If they killed somebody (Bahujans) the punishment will be %u2013 just tie a knot to their Shendi (Sort of a haircut- hairy ireland & a tree). Hence reservation in law. Whatever they want they can get it. Even now also they have everything. My question to all of you people what do you have????? We have nothing. Brahmins have looted our country from last 3000 years & still they looting us. Fact No.2: What is the income of Temples???? Do you have any idea???? 27,51,000/- crore of rupees per year (Income from Balaji, Shirdi & other temples. Proof: News in Sakal newspaper.). Doyou know the yearly budget of our country????? 9,23000 crores of rupees. Just see the difference. My question to all of you, who%u2019s money is this????? Ours!!!!!!! & what they r doing with this money ???? They r using this money to destroy the Bahujans. If you use this money for the farmers then there will not be any suicide in our country. Shahu Maharaj in Kolhapur (Maharashtra) had used the income of
RE:Ambedkar thought different
by selah on Apr 10, 2008 03:31 PM Permalink
Upper cast beurocrats will turn down all laws, which is not favorable to them in a systematic way. They have the strength in beurocracy to do that. Other wise 60 years after independence is not a short period to bring up these lower cast people to mainstream. Unfortunately, their condition is still pathetic. I am from kerala and I have so many examples with me how they do it. I am one of the scapegoats of these gangs. They appointed me in reservation seat even I was eligible with merit, which not is allow in present law. By this way, they can reduce one reservation seat. Like that, there are so many ways... Please note reservation not made for solving financial issues but to bring them up to mainstream...
RE:Ambedkar thought different
by Avinash on Apr 10, 2008 03:46 PM Permalink
Mr.selah, yur command over English language itself is proof of your eligibility under "merit". Read your message again and figure out or if you don't understand, pl go back to your English teacher.
RE:Ambedkar thought different
by ravi chandra on Apr 10, 2008 03:33 PM Permalink
IT IS NOT THE FALT OF AMBEDKAR THIS IS ONLY FROM POLITICIANS ,DOING FOR VOTE BANK.LUCKY POLITICAL EYE IS NOT ON "IT 'INDUSTRY THEY HAVE NOT PUT THERE HAND MUCH IN PRIVATE SECTOR ,IF IT HAPPENS INDIA WLL GOBACK TO 25 YEARS
RE:Ambedkar thought different
by Alam Wazir on Apr 10, 2008 03:35 PM Permalink
Ambedkar was wrong to reject Islam. All Dalits should have converted to Islam. Because of this Ambedkar wrote wrong constitution. See how many hundreds of amendments are made to constitution? If the constitution was good would it have been amended so many times? Now compare that with the Quran, which is timeless. India was very prosperous under Islam, from Delhi to Kanyakumari, we ruled. Let us bring back those glory days again.
RE:Ambedkar thought different
by Vijeth CM on Apr 10, 2008 03:40 PM Permalink
Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Pakistan, bangladesh === GLORY!! get lost out of India if you want to divide the country based on caste and religion.
RE:Ambedkar thought different
by james on Apr 10, 2008 03:31 PM Permalink
brahmin repect all persons who are honest and to be recognisable. I think it was a bad luck for ambedkar that he born or converted to your caste.
