the problem is that PPL FROM OTHER REGIONS do think SIMILARLY.... for eg the cm of karnataka said and i quote-------" if the it cos dont provide employment opportunities to the locals then v dont need them ".. this problem is everywhere in assam , northeast states, tibet ,usa and even in delhi... i think the locals should be given priorities everywhere be it bihar or maharashtra...the logic is simple--- when an industry is established----land is taken from the locals, the state govts provide incentives (which is from the taxpayers pocket and not from migrant workers), if there is a pollution problem the locals hav 2 bear the brunt, then isnt it logical to give "PREFERENCE" TO LOCALS ( I M NOT USING THE TERM RESERVATION)....
RE:truth
by Abdulla Pathan on Apr 10, 2008 02:10 PM Permalink
All organization prefer local people for better perfromance and access to local facilities; However nich skilled labour will be required for new industries. Local should not take normal education instead they should should take specialization.
Recent example: This example from Baramati, Pune. Few group of farmers started thier own winery and they got support from government for same.
Above example gives message that locals should come together and do some good things. Indian Government has good policies to support agro based production houses.
