Tibet was always a sovereign nation until Mao's murdering Red Army invaded, with the wholehearted blessing of that idiot Nehru and his Commie minion Menon. If, as this article surmises, that Uncle Sam is actually helping the Tibetan people to counter the scourge of the butchering Red Army, then that's something to be welcomed, not demeaned, unless one is a card-carrying member of the CPI. India was entrusted with the security of Tibet by the departing Brits, but the cowardly, naieve idiot Nehru, sold these poor folks down the drain, just to suck up to his 'pal' Chou-en-Lai, who then proceeded to invade India just three years later, in '62 - says a lot about 'Congress Policy' and national security.
RE:Tibet
by abcdabcd on Apr 10, 2008 09:24 AM Permalink
You are not golden but tagadu....rotted iron. Do you history at all? Dint your teachers and parents teach you anything at all? Of course they dint coz there are no schools in pakistan i guess. Patel never invaded kashmir. The king of kashmir made it part of india fearing pakistan would put its ugly stinking tentacles into kashmir also. He thought being with india would be better than paki. But lo nd behold! Pakis never allowed paradise to survive. They aer jut not interested in kashmiris but only in kashmir. If they had an inch of tolerance for kashmiris then terrorism would not have happend there. See what baluchistan brings to pakistan in a few years....death and destruction.
RE:Tibet
by prasun premrajan on Apr 10, 2008 09:20 AM Permalink
If what you said is true then i would like to tell you Golden that your islamic barbarians ivaded kashmir and butchered all the hindus that lived there and got them convereted. so look at history in a big picture. Kashmir belongs to india and not to the nymphomanic prophet of your mohammed.
RE:Tibet
by Santosh kumar on Apr 10, 2008 09:25 AM Permalink
watch ur mouth b4 speaking against such iron man of india, sardar ballabh bhai patel, if u r pro paki then u have reason to celebrate, if patel was PM that time half of Pakistan wud hav been under indian territory.
RE:Tibet
by vipul parmar on Apr 10, 2008 09:30 AM Permalink
@Golden Hey kid just read the real history and come out from your islamic, pro pakistani brain wash. This column is for literate people. Rediff should ban this kind of illiterate, madrassa tought and weak minded idiots. I dont think you know anything except urdu and english and had ever took book other than your own stupid so called holy book.
RE:Tibet
by abcdabcd on Apr 10, 2008 09:30 AM Permalink
Who wants their stinking cursed territory. If there is public consensus, I would vote for an invasion of pakistan but not to annexxe it. India is better off without the people or the land of pakistan coming back to india.
