RE:pok
by Koduvayur on Apr 08, 2008 02:37 PM Permalink
You may not be totally wrong, but I think we all must admit that democracy survived in our country due to the policies of our leaders. See our neighbours. While we are prospering fast they are tottering and on the brink of bankruptcy. So our leaders were not that bad.
RE:pok
by Abdulla Pathan on Apr 08, 2008 02:39 PM Permalink
Jammu and Kashimr was ruled by King Shah. He was Hindu King for muslim population. His population wanted to be different identity. Britishers' also had interest in Jammu and Kashmir as it was similar kind of environment as any europian country. King didn't wanted to go along with India or Pakistan.
During Independance British has given option to all kingdom to take thier decision. They didn't wanted to force them to be part of India or Pak as they have served Britisher for 300/400 years.
As soon as Independance decleared for India and Pakistan. Pakistan was mainly ruled by local bodies ( which is still present in Baluch and Wazaristan, similar). They attacked weak King Shah, King expected help from Britishers and Britisher approached India for help. However India wanted King shah to sign agreement of merger of Jammu and Kashmir as part of India, which King was relunctant to do. This process has taken so much time that Kabila militia was 50 km away from Srinagar and King realized that he will not able to keep his kingdom in both option ( one was forced and 2nd was available). He has signed agreement and Indian Government has quickly send Indian army to srinagar and Saved Srinagar and started taking other parts of Jammu and Kashmir. However War has to be stopped by Britisher and they have asked pakistan to give back occupied POK. However newly elected Pak govenrment was helpless in front of Kabila militia ( This is still true, as they can not take any action even after
RE:pok
by harshuk on Apr 08, 2008 02:56 PM Permalink
Hi Abdulla, Why were kashmiris,Pakistanis,Afghanistan,Iran(majority) so afraid of Muslims that they got converted to Islam...? Does this mean all the Muslims in this region are/were cowards ..?
RE:pok
by Abdulla Pathan on Apr 08, 2008 03:22 PM Permalink
Social people always affrid of goons. It is not linked with any religion.
Now also if you take look at common man, who is not coward however he never take one on one with goons.
About Conversion to Islam, I would suggest my friend that you should read about Islam and meaning of Muslim. Person does not to be following Islam to be a Muslim.
If you want understand more why people have converted to Islam, then please read basic information about reason behind Islam or watch movie "The Message".
We normally speak without having knowledge about background of it.
RE:pok
by cnrgpal on Apr 08, 2008 02:12 PM Permalink
chalke chalke gaya. Arey budhoo, it is a universal truth that POK is the creation of Nehru who wants to be PM of India. He was ready to give half of India to Pakistan but the only demand was that he should become PM.
RE:pok
by indiarocks on Apr 08, 2008 02:16 PM Permalink
If M K Gandhi had let another fellow Gujju (Sardar Patel) become India's First PM...India would have been much better shape and POK would have been part of India.
RE:pok
by ganesh shyam on Apr 08, 2008 02:13 PM Permalink
Bcoz India got premature Independence & Nehru( beauty without brains) cudn't handle & kept Patel/Bose away ...so the mess in all departments
