The books which he quotes from in Tamil and Bengali were written 1000s of years after Valmiki Ramayan - the original book from whom Tulsi das was inspired ...
Dont quote these unauthentic versions which were written 1000s of years later ...
If today after 1400 years I write a book saying that Khadija was Muhammed's mother and that makes your prophet a mothrfckkrr, would u agree ? I would NOT
So, dont behave like a reatrded, imbecile kid! Rather, be ashamed of those autheentic hadiths which show your prophet in such a bad light
Finally, can u swear in the name of Allah that what u write, u know it to be true? I can swear in Shri Ram's name, that what u write is not true ... So dont dig your own grave by citing false sources like Aranya Kandam (tamil)
RE:@Ibanmeer : DONT QUOTE UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS OF RAMAYAN
by Ibnameer on Apr 01, 2008 06:25 PM Permalink
Boss..the translation is not done by Christian missioneries or Madrassas..itz done by a Hindu...by a brahmin.....is brahmin writes ill about Ram???Is a hindu writes wrong stories??? WHAT LEADERS SAY ABOUT GOD RAMA? Gandhiji: "My Rama (god Rama) is not the Rama of Ramayana".
"The Ramayana and Mahabaratha are nothing but another Arabian Nights story" - JAWAHERLAL NEHRU
RE:@Ibanmeer : DONT QUOTE UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS OF RAMAYAN
by Web Monkey on Apr 01, 2008 06:37 PM Permalink
Hinduism and Christainity along with many other religion, doesnt bother about individuals opinion. Killing people who doesnt have same opinion is something no religion should teach. Islam is just a religions by and for barbarians. Dont try to say a brahmin said so and foolishness so on. There are so many brahmins with differnt opinion. Islam will never understand tolerance, but lot of other religions do.
RE:@Ibanmeer : DONT QUOTE UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS OF RAMAYAN
by JGN on Apr 01, 2008 06:32 PM Permalink
Yes, similarly all other religious scriptures are also creations of surrealistic visionaries. Why single out only one?
RE:@Ibanmeer : DONT QUOTE UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS OF RAMAYAN
by Ibnameer on Apr 01, 2008 06:40 PM Permalink
If u dnt agree it is not authentic......u r yet to understand it....if the source is wrong the why should a hindu translate it???? HAve u ever seen Bukhari book???? Dnt copy and abuse it with some anti-muslim documents
RE:@Ibanmeer : DONT QUOTE UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS OF RAMAYAN
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 01, 2008 06:22 PM Permalink
Hope u get the message .. else next time u post, swear in allah's name that u know what is true !
RE:@Ibanmeer : DONT QUOTE UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS OF RAMAYAN
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 01, 2008 06:48 PM Permalink
LISTEN UP IMBECILE MIND: i m not questioning the translation, i am questioning the source itself ... these are untrue ! For example, the Bengali version quoted was a work of fiction, a ballad written for plays ... u cant treat those as authentic
Finally, do u want me to quote what great thinkker Bertnand Russel thinks about Muhammed !
Also, leave later leaders: Consider this Hadith:
Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299:
Narrated 'Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Aswad:
(on the authority of his father) 'Aisha said: "Whenever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her." 'Aisha added, "None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could."
Bukhar, iVolume 1, Book 6, Number 300:
Narrated Maimuna:
When ever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle any of his wives during the periods (menses), he used to ask her to wear an Izar
There are mamny such other hadiths , which are authentic and written by muslims only ! GOT IT ? Should I quote more of thses ? These are original sources, unlike the derived sources u quote
