Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
save India................
by rahavi madhavan on Sep 26, 2007 12:20 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

I do not know whether the Bridge was constructed by Ram or Not. But when it needs demolition for the sake of improvement of the country why can't it be demolished ? Even God will allow you to do so.....I feel. We uprooted so many trees and caused so much damage for the environment for many projects. Similarly so many temples were relocated for road projects and all. Now the biggest worry is that the problem is diving India and politicians are capable of doing it.......and doing it ever. I pray God/Ram to give wisdom to the people of India to think on their own and decide on by not fall prey to politicians and all religious fundamentalists. Hey Ram..........Save India.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:save India................
by ram satyam on Sep 26, 2007 12:53 PM   Permalink
Then Rahavi, why dont the Govt. let Mayavati to build a Mall near to Taj...because it will endanger its ecosystem and the very building Taj. Dont you think some filth eating people are hypocrites to have different verdicts for different ancient structures...


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:save India................
by shivram sreenivasan adithya on Sep 26, 2007 12:46 PM   Permalink
Dear R M, I request you to take a holistic view. Of course it is a rational view.
The project as the political party claims is not a commercially feasible one. It is commercially feasible for the political party only.
One of our navy captain said the cost (for a bigger vessel) will work out the same if not less when compared with sailing around sri lanka and taking into consideration the distance to be travelled and speed of a vessel. It is feasible only for smaller vessel which can use the existing route itself.
It is not going to improve life of fisherman as fishes will not survive if we use it as a sea route. Moreover environmental pollution, ecological degradation is also applicable to Sea and living organisams using this area.
Removing the bridge will also increase risk of Tsunami. Do you know recent Tsunami did not affect Southern Tamilnadu.
Considering the cost and benefit including cost for people with religious faith, it is not recommended.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Nobody has proved Ram didn't exist'