People who have not read the RAMAYANA fully are talking through there head. I request them to first read the holy book. In the book where LANKA is described, it gives the location of lanka on THE WEST COAST OF BHARAT, hence the present day Sri Lanka is not the lanka of the Ramayana. We should try to find the location of Bharat first, as there is no island on the west coast of India which suits the description of the lanka of the Ramayana. Hence fightening about the connection between India and Sri Lanka and calling it Rama's bridge is just waste of time.
RE:Rama's bridge
by ASIM MEHTANI on Sep 26, 2007 11:59 AM Permalink
It seems that you have only read Ramayana, others have not. Do not try to creat new theory.
