Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Take Help From National Geographic
by Smart Guy on Sep 25, 2007 11:17 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Well, It can easily be proved that this is a Man Made or Natural bridge (as per congress people).



I would ask the VHP people to pay some bucks to National Geographic or Discovery Guys , they will prove it better than anyone else.



use brains than shouting

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by imran patel on Sep 25, 2007 11:20 PM   Permalink
Not a bad idea...As long as the results are shared and validated.



Bring in outside help. But Mr.Togadia must give up if this 3rd party team concludes otherwise.



Agree ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by Smart Guy on Sep 25, 2007 11:23 PM   Permalink
and what would you do if some one questions of existence of "Allah"...dont mind

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by imran patel on Sep 25, 2007 11:32 PM   Permalink
Muslims are NOT claiming any public property based on their beliefs...That is the difference !!!



I am not against Hindus believing in Ram. But if you are claiming property, then you have to prove it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 25, 2007 11:34 PM   Permalink


Muslims are claiming whole world based on Allah's rights.



You are either a fool, or rotten jehadi thinking people are fool not to understand it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by Mahesh G on Sep 25, 2007 11:35 PM   Permalink
what is there in mecca.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by imran patel on Sep 25, 2007 11:38 PM   Permalink
Mecca is NOT a Non-Muslim property. If it legally belonged to the Non-Muslims and Muslims were to claim it, then they either need to buy it or prove their case in the court of LAW.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by Mahesh G on Sep 25, 2007 11:37 PM   Permalink
all the terrorists who caught is Muslims. Is there any thing allah told to do such mischeivious activities

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by Smart Guy on Sep 25, 2007 11:38 PM   Permalink
u will only feel the pain, only when someone asks for building of Aiport at medina...then lets see...how you prove what you ask others...



Today we are facing this...tomorrow...u may

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by Ramesh P on Sep 25, 2007 11:47 PM   Permalink
What did the muslims do when the very same ASI said that a 11th century temple existed under the ruins of Babri Masjid ?? Don't you still claim that is your property ?? Also many proofs existed abt muslims destroying Kashi, Mathura and many temples - did you give those temples back ?? As togadia rightly said - comparing hinduism which is very ancient and old religion - with proofs saying that its atleast 10,000 yrs old (Bhimbatka caves in Chattisgarh) - to something less than 2000 yrs old is ridiculous. Also when there were so many proofs infront of our own eyes of muslims freaking out with fatwas, prize for getting head of Danish cartoonist, making a woman's husband her son, honor killings, bombings, terror attacks on parliaments, assemblies etcc what are we doing ? We couldn't even hang a terrorist who was proven guilty by supreme court. Proof is only for those who are rational and sane, not for Karunas, Sonis and Soniagandhis.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by imran patel on Sep 25, 2007 11:55 PM   Permalink
Ramesh,

I would encourage that VHP/BJP should have bought that property.



I was always open to that idea.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Take Help From National Geographic
by gali on Sep 25, 2007 11:44 PM   Permalink
you go to nasa.gov and see the pictures of the bridge,if it is not man made,thats also OK because rama is a god and not man.

If it is man made,thats also ok,because ramas friends who built it were humans.

got it.



there's nothing smart in you smart guy,your arguments are vague.when there is something that people have a sentiment attached to,probably showing respect to it is a good idea.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Nobody has proved Ram didn't exist'