Atheist genrally used to speak sensibily,but this man Karnnanidhi has proved himself otherwise .while he is saying that Ram was a fictitious character and did not exist , he has also said that Ram was a drunkard.see his brilliance .How does he say yhat that the non-existent Ram was a drunlkard? Senility has taken iuts toll and imposed such arotten head as cthe Chief Miniater of Tamil Nadu.Another interting point is that he had in a diffferent context extolled Ravana as a great Tamil King of Sri lanka .Ravan was an Historical person who was vanguished by Rama .Was Ravana vanguished by a non-existant person? Idiocy seems to have nolinmits in Tamil Nadu.Thei sis he problem with the illietrate politicians who ar econferred Doctorates also in Tamil nadu.He is a blot on Tamil Nadu.
RE:'Nobody has proved that Ram did not exist'
by Bala krishnan on Sep 26, 2007 07:27 AM Permalink
Well Mr Ragavan Kesavan somebody has to appreciate your brilliance.
Rediff said: "I have not said anything more than Valmiki, who authored Ramayana. Valmiki had even stated that Ram was a drunkard. Have I said so?" he said at the DMK headquarters in Chennai on Thursday.
Newindpress said: "I have not said anything more than Valmiki, who authored Ramayana," he asked while replying to questions from reporters at the DMK headquarters here. "Is Advani ready to discuss Ramayana with me in the same platform after going through Valmiki Ramayana fully?" he asked. Asked whether he would accept implementing the project without disturbing Ram Setu, he said the intention of the project was not to destroy the Ram Setu."I only want the project to be implemented at the earliest as it would reduce the shipping expenses and develop trade.
"These are the exact comments" Now from where are earth you claim MK called Ram drunkard -- Do you have brain or its just not working on this one?
RE:'Nobody has proved that Ram did not exist'
by Deepak MA on Sep 26, 2007 09:55 AM Permalink
SathiyaNarayanan: Please explain the meaning of your name.
