I AM NOT ANATHEIST, AND I AM A HINDU. AT THE SAME TIME I AM NOT A FANATIC. I BELEIVE IN ALL THE RELIGIONS. I FEEL THAT ALL THE SO CALED GODA WERE HUMAN BIRTHS OF THE SAME SUPER POWER (GOD) WHENEVER THE SOCIETY NEEDED THEM. AT THE SAME TIME I DO NOT BELEIVE THAT THE SO CALLED RAM SETHU IS "THE REMAIN" OF THE BRIDGE BUILT FOR RAM. HENCE, NO ECONOMIC PROGRESS SHOULD BE STOPPED ON SUCH ISSUES, UNLESS AND OTHERWISE PROVED.
RE:RAM SETHU
by Muralidhar on Sep 25, 2007 03:51 PM Permalink
What economic you are speaking? You are investing approximatley around 3000 crorea and you are saving only 80 crores a year. I mean you are not able to repay the interest itself?
RE:RAM SETHU
by gautam shah on Sep 25, 2007 03:56 PM Permalink
economics for the technical team to decide. I was talking about the blind faith that ram sthu is the remain of the bridge built for Ram. This cannot be a consideration for not going ahead with the project.
RE:RE:RAM SETHU
by Sanjeev Sharma on Sep 25, 2007 04:04 PM Permalink
Blind faith is belief in stupid and non-existent things like virgin birth or winged horse flying to heaven. Belief in actions of a man who is remembered by humanity for his ideals and actions is not blind by definition. Mere absence of proof cannot be considered enough to make it blind. In most cases, civilizations remember their heroes long enough. Troy was considered to part of Greek Mythology until it was actually discovered. Similarly, Indian history is alleged to be mythology by rank outsider and robots produced by outsider-managed education.
Existance of Saraswati river is proved, as is the existence of dwarka. HOwever, true mythologies like Aryan invasion have never been proved.