partial removal going to affect the ecology that drastically now. In case the supposed bridge is a submerged mountain ridge, can its partial escavation make the ecology topsy turvy?
In the name of Ram, there should not be any impediment in the proposed canal, because he built it in the humility of man. In the name of ecology, there should not be any impediment in the proposed canal, because neither its construction by Ram nor its formation due to some natural cause, have not seem to have resulted in destruction !!
Now, like good baniyas, let us come to the point. In case the returns from the canal is not worth the investments (it is said that the new canal after completion would be suitable for the safe passage of a certain capacity ships, which are being phased out !!), then the canal project should not be undertaken.
Thank Ram that at last Marwaris have taken over the responsibility to practice and promote Hinduism, when the other `superior castes' have gone to become ...... well I need not have to say. Otherwise, how the VHP would have ever hoped to get enough supply of free Ramayans for their proposed morcha ? :)
