Being a hindu, I am surprised that people are debating whether Hindus are really Muslims or not. However, being of a rational bent of mind, if indeed Hinduism came before Islam, then it may be possible that you need to also do research on whether Muhammed the prophet was a Hindu or not. Logically speaking, if a relegion has come before Islam, then more likely that Islam is an offshoot of the original relegion than the other way round. Also, you need to do research on what is inside the Kaba at Mecca because many have the doubt that there are actually Hindu idols over there. So when all Muslims go for Haj and pray to the Kaba, they are actually praying to Hindu Gods and are therefore, Hindus. Again, you must also agree that the Koran is almost identical to the Old Testament (Bible) except for minor details such as the fact that Islam considers itself to be descended from Ismail rather than Isaac, who is considered by Christians / Jews to be their forefather. Since both the Christians and the Muslims took the Old Testament from "The Tanakh", which is the holy book of the Jews, it also follows that Muhammad may even have been a jew. Who knows right? So, I would honestly suggest that you research these discrepancies first before you start researching the origins of Lord Ram et al.
RE:Are Muslims really Hindus?
by Jensy George on Sep 25, 2007 04:54 PM Permalink
Islam did originate from Christianity. In the old testament i is written that Ismail (Ismail) was born of Abraham and Hagar. Read teh bible Old testament for full story.
