RE:No bridge for ravana
by Dream Girl on Sep 24, 2007 12:24 PM Permalink
Reveal your religion honestly... We will show you how many illogical things exist in each of the religions in the world... Ravan crossed the sea as one man on pushpak viman... Ram had to take an army with him across the sea... So there is logic... dont keep blabering..
RE:No bridge for ravana
by JGN on Sep 24, 2007 12:29 PM Permalink
It is like the terrorists weilding AK47, AK56, etc and the poor policemen forced to combat them with lathis and .303 Rifles. Does this make sense?
RE:No bridge for ravana
by Suresh on Sep 24, 2007 12:19 PM Permalink
No direct flight....Like Air Deccan it was cancelled and Lord Ram was informed about the cancellation at the airport. Is that good enough reason ?
Why dont you ask how Mary concieved Jesus without an intercourse. Why only pick on Hindu Gods and Godesses
RE:No bridge for ravana
by csoupramanien on Sep 24, 2007 12:18 PM Permalink
TAMIL COMMUNITY AND IT'S THOUGHTS ARE BEYOND TIMES. PERIYAR E V RAMASAMY WITNESSED THAT TRUTH AND TAUGHT THE TAMIL SOCIETY TO REMOVE THE CAST AND RELIGION DIVIDES. SO AS TAMILS WILL PRAISE THEIR OWN GODS AND TEMPLES AND LIKE TO GO WITH DRAVIDIAN PRICIPLES SAME TOGETHER. DRAVIDIAN PRINCIPLE IS PURELY BASED ON NATURE. WE WORSHIP NATURE AND GO WITH NATURE BUT NOT WITH RELIGION AND BLIND FAITH. BRAMHANISM WAS LONG BEFORE DEAD IN TAMIL COMMUNITY. SO TALKING ABOUT RAM OR ALLA WILL NOT MAKE ANY CAUSE IN THAT HOLY LAND. AFTER RAM..........BUDHA, MAHAVIRA,ADISANKARA WERE BORN AND TAUGHT THE REALITY OF OUR OWN SO CALLED 'HINDUISM' IN MODERATE WAY, BUT STILL MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE IS LIVING IN RAM ERA IS SAD ONE. AS NORTH WAS FOCUSSED ON BUILDING RAM TEMPLE IN AYODHYA, HERE AT SOUTH WE ESTABLISHED SOFTWARE MOVEMENTS TO PUSH OUR INDIAN ECONOMY. WHEN U PEOPLE INTERESTED IN EXECUTING GUJARAT RIOTS, HERE AT SOUTH WE ARE KEEN ON PURA PRJECTS AND E-EDUCATION AND E-GOVERNANCE. BEWARE DIVISIVE FORCES, TAMIL LAND IS NOT FOR YOU.........INVADE THE LAND WHERE FOOLS ARE LIVING...
RE:No bridge for ravana
by arvind rb on Sep 24, 2007 12:20 PM Permalink
SKSK... fool .... why did not allaha not Kill all Kafits to have islam why did he need a mohameded
RE:No bridge for ravana
by m r on Sep 24, 2007 12:23 PM Permalink
Now that has to be the end of it. Its like childrens stories, pushpak vimaan...... ha ha ha ha ..when the whole world is moving ahead...we still beleive in pushpak vimaans...Truly speaking ,it is just mythological story , little else , even Nehru and many eminent writers have affirmed that
RE:No bridge for ravana
by maha moderator on Sep 24, 2007 12:19 PM Permalink
ok how this pushpak viman runs ravanas has pushpak viman but ramas your hereo doesnt have in ancient ages also you people were backward in technology. or rama might be a tribal man
RE:No bridge for ravana
by Ramanath Babu on Sep 24, 2007 12:31 PM Permalink
The answer is simple idiot moderator. Rama had come to this earth with a specific purpose. Before killing Ravana, he had to perform many noble acts. His southward journey, meeting with Sugreeva etc. were all part of this agenda. He being Lord, could have taken an easy route. He even prayed to Lord Varuna (the God of Sea) to give way so as to help his Vanaras to build bridge. When Varuna was not yielding, he had to take his bow, and it was at that time Varuna fearfully appeared in front of him and apologised for the delay and adivsed how to go about in building the bridge. For your inforamtion, Rama was aware of the purpose of his Avatar, who the Ravana is and how and when he is going to abduct Sita. Rama therefore sent Sita (Lakshmi Devi) back and in her place a Maya sita was created whom Ravana abducted. To know all these things, you have to be widely read man which you are not and that is several questions are coming to your mind. You are half-informed and that is the root-cause of all probelms. Accept that your knowledge is very limited, then you will start getting answers to your all queries.
