Message deleted by moderator

RE:Why only ram sethu?
by Rationalist on Sep 23, 2007 10:10 PM Permalink
Nice question

Forward | Report abuse

RE:Why only ram sethu?
by san man on Sep 23, 2007 10:13 PM Permalink
You're not a rationalist, stop lying and pretending. Rationalism isn't about your kind of racism. Stop hijacking the beliefs of others. Likewise, if Karunanidhi doesn't like Brahmins, why does he like to boast that Ravana was a brahmin? Does this mean he feels the image of brahminism is improved by being associated with Ravana?

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator

RE:RE:RE:Why only ram sethu?
by MGR Fan on Sep 23, 2007 10:27 PM Permalink
He did.. he wrote ravana kaviyam and put chappal on rama in 1960s..

Forward | Report abuse

RE:Why only ram sethu?
by MGR Fan on Sep 23, 2007 10:12 PM Permalink
Sethu canal is waste of money. Only contractors benefit.

As for your question, it is a joke, Ramar lives in all our hearts. Whether sethu goes or gets cancelled, you cant stop that 4 sure.

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator

RE:RE:RE:RE:Why only ram sethu?
by CHAKKAR on Sep 23, 2007 10:27 PM Permalink
SHOW UR HOLY HOLE THEY WILL MANUFACTURE A SPL CRACKER FROM SIVAKASI FOR U

Forward | Report abuse

RE:Why only ram sethu?
by jai ram on Sep 23, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
Really? Does he live alone or with his entire troupe?

Forward | Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator