RE:MK's philosophy
by true tamilan on Sep 23, 2007 11:11 PM Permalink
He himself is a minority CM who carries on along with another communal party congress. He cannot do without congress in TN and congress cannot do without dmk in centre.
He won the election because of his promise for free color tv. How does election commission of india allow these gimmicks? If u had seen sun tv, free color tv was like a ad playing again and again. I sometimes think india is not matured for democracy.
RE:MK's philosophy
by dinesh kumar on Sep 23, 2007 11:13 PM Permalink
after periyar garlanding rama with chappals,there were not any references to rama.
until rama was brought into politics to stop development.
then the issue of rama being imaginary was brought up.
u r so vehement today,imagine ur vehemence when untouchables were dought to be allowed into temples.
dr kalaignar is the warrior who still stands from that fight against brahminism and when he speaks ,it is from the knowledge of the actions of the brahmins of those days.
RE:MK's philosophy
by MGR Fan on Sep 23, 2007 11:16 PM Permalink
No, it happened few times in late 60s also.
BTW ravanakaviyam was made compulsory subject in schools during DMK rule of 1989.
Untouchability was enforced in practise by OBCs. Bramins were always too small to enforce anything. The pannaiyar (and not poojari) was central character in Tmail society in 19th century and you forget that.
RE:MK's philosophy
by CHAKKAR on Sep 23, 2007 11:16 PM Permalink
UR PEIYAR MIGHT HAVE GARLANDED RAMA WITH CHAPPALS...AS DIDNT FIND ANY FLOWERS IN SOME TIME OF DROUGHT HIT TAMILNADU........ TAHT IS ANOTHER FORM OF WORSHIPPING GOD.... BUT U FOOLS DIDNT UNDERSTAND....
RE:MK's philosophy
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 23, 2007 11:16 PM Permalink
I think you need to educate lot of folks from TN abt how to analyse politics, my observation so far has been that, they see only what the politicians want to show them, many hardly use their brain. And many are ready to die for a anti-national element, BTW I'm also from south.
