When his daughter Ms. Selvi's house was attacked in Bangalore, MK had made the comment that it showed the culture of the 'Ram Sevaks'! Now what culture does the attck on BJP's office show?? Would any MK lovers clarifies this ??
RE:Pls answer this
by amit jain on Sep 24, 2007 09:30 AM Permalink
DMK culture to attack BJP office is right. VHP culture to attack Ms. Selvi's house is wrong. To grow bacteria culture, you need dirt and MK has plenty of it.
RE:Pls answer this
by Bala krishnan on Sep 24, 2007 07:25 AM Permalink
Are you out of mind's? Is Ms.Selvi a political entity? -- BJP and VHP are the political organisations who doen't the know meaning of conversation --- If they want to counter an argument -- You have comeup with a suitable answer --rather than blindly issuing Fatwa --- And what you can expect if such an idiot who was two time MP( I don't know how such a fool was given a ticket) talk like that -- Bear the consequence you cowards
If Karunanidhi is not a Neuter let him talk like that abt ALLAH standing in the middle of AFGHANISTHAN/PAKISTAN.. then you will understand the word ...'CONSEQUENSES'
RE:Pls answer this
by Bala krishnan on Sep 24, 2007 07:38 AM Permalink
You are one big time idiot -- Why someone has to talk about ALLAH when you say obstruct a development project in the name of RAM?? -- And whom you want to be called as idiot????
RE:Pls answer this
by true tamilan on Sep 24, 2007 07:42 AM Permalink
Who opposed development? What we are asking for is an alternate alignment without breaking the bridge. Can't you guys understand that simple thing?
RE:Pls answer this
by true tamilan on Sep 24, 2007 07:52 AM Permalink
Some people say breaking the bridge will allow kerala to have more tsunami. You are telling alternate alignment will cause ecological disaster.
Ok, what happened to water desalination plant in chennai? Do we have to beg water from karnataka every year, fight with Kerala on mullaperiyar project? Can't we show the same enthusiasam on these.
RE:Pls answer this
by true tamilan on Sep 24, 2007 07:59 AM Permalink
1, Why this enthusiasm in this project when so many better projects which will have daily impact on common man's life never took off?
2, Some scientists are saying breaking the bridge or barrier as you termed will create ecological disaster. But still want to go ahead with same alignment?
RE:Pls answer this
by Bala krishnan on Sep 24, 2007 07:48 AM Permalink
And why dont you understand there is no other way possible rather than this alignment and that is why the previous BJP government agreed to this. And do you have one strong reason why the same BJP who is opposing now had authorized this alignment and project --- Because any other alternate way is a great danger to ecology -- And even in this alignment the full sand deposits are not going to be removed -- Only the portion where ships can pass, so that they can have the depth.....And no one can accept your version of history as a reason to prevent this form happening as by history India is not one country before and each had their own belif and traditions including the hindu's whom BJP represents all of them for. Now you can understand this simple thing.
RE:Pls answer this
by Bala krishnan on Sep 24, 2007 07:56 AM Permalink
Who is that some people?? Are you not going to belive two Indian governments one under BJP and one under UPA studied which alignment is best??? And from where the desalination project same up? Are we discussing Tamilnadu politcs here instead of Shipping canal project --That should be a different platform altogether -- All you guys know but pretend that you dont know any of these.
RE:Pls answer this
by true tamilan on Sep 24, 2007 08:25 AM Permalink
I am not opposing the implementation of project. You keep vascillating between the bridge and existence of Lord Rama. Ok, to answer both.
There are scientists who oppose breaking the bridge saying it will cause natural calmity. Even when tsunami came, some scientists opined that bridge prevented kerala from the brunt of tsunami. So if the pro is lessening of the time for shipping, con is ecological disaster. I am saying go for the alternate alignment.
I have voiced my opinion everywhere. I do not have a huge number of followers who do anything for me without any reasoning.
Nehru is a self-professed atheist. His ideas are totally leftist. Now for Rajaji, less said the better. My whole point is you cannot have two rules, one for minority and one for majority. It is a favorite pastime of MK to attack hinduism. Then why ban da vinci code in tN?
If he had opposed all religions like periyar did, i cud empathize with him. But mk is an opportunistic politician.
RE:Pls answer this
by Bala krishnan on Sep 24, 2007 08:06 AM Permalink
Ok let me ask you why are opposing implementing this project?
What have you done to protest against not implementing other projects?
So you dont belive two governments and scientits and still claim about some scientists?? And by your argument what is wrong in denying Ram because there are some scientists who claim it was just a mythological story - including Jawaharlal Nehru and Rajaji??
RE:RE:Pls answer this
by skumara samy on Sep 24, 2007 08:05 AM Permalink
MK do not need to go Afgan or Pakistan. Let him to deliver his open comments on other religions, as he delivers against Hindus. He will not do it. He know what will happend. A real "Pagutharivu" person should comment on all the religions and Gods.
RE:RE:RE:Pls answer this
by Bala krishnan on Sep 24, 2007 08:07 AM Permalink
Why on earth he have to comment on other religions if you are saying Ram had built the bridge. Now you dont need Pagutharivu to answer this question, you just need arivu.
