Mr. Karunanidhi may be asked if he believed Kannagi existed and if he did what was the basis for his belief. Does he believe that she set the City of Madurai aflame by the power of her chastity.
There are questions about Jesus Christ and Resurrection. But these cannot stop billions of people all over the world having total faith in Jesus.
Mr. Karunanidhi would be well advised to keep hisd trap shut. If he thinks he is a statesman, that is what he should do and not hurt the sentiments of millions of his own countrymen.
Imagine Mr. Karunanidhi expressing such an opinion about a character in Islam and getting away with it.
RE:Mr. Karunanidhi's Statement On Sri Rama
by Bala krishnan on Sep 22, 2007 08:40 AM Permalink
Well Mr. Sreeni Vas -- Does Kannagi -- had built a bridge that is stopping the development of an important shipping canal, which can bring a great amount of revenues and employement across south India?? If then I am sure MK would take steps to remove the bridge. If you think he wouldn't that is you know about the rational movement he heads?. And for this you dont even to think rational. For example , while construction highways many small temples built across roads are removed( those are god's home and not a bridge built by Ram). This is just the same, except BJP wants some votes on its favor.
RE:RE:Mr. Karunanidhi's Statement On Sri Rama
by sowhat on Sep 22, 2007 08:57 AM Permalink
the purpuse of the bridge was over. Sita had been rescued from Ravana and then got kicked out to forest by Ram and then after a decade Ram took her back with him. What is the need for that bridge now?
