Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Ram
by krishnan hv on Sep 21, 2007 03:33 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Had anybody from other community been commented against,as Mr karunanidhi did against Ram, the whole community would have been up in arms. More importantly all these so called secular parties would have, in one voice, condemmed the issue. however no one says anything about what Karunanidhi has commented or continues to comment. No SMS polls by media nothing. Nothing could have been a more perfect example of pseudo secularism being practiced in this country. Is it only because Hindus are generally peace loving people? Is it because no Hindu Gurus issue Fatwa's at the drop of a hat? Is it because Hindus are more tolerant to abuse?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Ram
by Vijay Ganapathy on Sep 21, 2007 03:36 PM   Permalink
See do not speek about other community, now the issue is whether ram built adams bridge or not. nasa had clearly said it is not man made, then why unnecessarily BJP is politising the issue in the name of god

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Ram
by jonnywaker on Sep 21, 2007 05:26 PM   Permalink
vijay you are product of adam and eve and brainwashed by satan.hence you say that ram seth
as adam bridge.british named ramsethu as ''adam
bridge''in order to supress hinduism.either you are convert or reading only''the hindu''news paper without knowing the facts.but for bjp,
india would have been be a chirstian country.if
you are in bpo,it looks like that you are feeling proud of your nickname''adam".

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:Ram
by vinod bhat on Sep 21, 2007 03:47 PM   Permalink
Mus@lman hain kya tu S@la

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Ram
by lineprintek on Sep 21, 2007 03:55 PM   Permalink
is the nasas word ultimate. How do you conclude that it is not man made. How do you know the capabilities of Ram . You are trying to find out the capabilities of Ram with your small yard sitk t. That is the problem

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Ram
by jonnywaker on Sep 21, 2007 05:03 PM   Permalink
ganapathy,can you tell the names of your forefathers names for last 20 generations.you can not spell more than 2/3 max.imagine monkeys
built this bridge before 17.25 lacs years.due to changes in earth,it looks like natural now.
why this bridge is situated only without break
between rameswaram and srilanka.in ramayana,lord
ram crossed the bridge only from rameswarm.
can you tell same type of bridge without break between two nations for 35 kms in any ocean situated elsewhere. hindus believe ramayana happened before 17.25 lacs years ago.this is
like you think that you are born to your mother
although you did not see yourself (if seen,can
not go to brain due to divine nature).if you do not believe ram sethu existence,you have to doubt about rootcause of your birth also.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Ram
by Sreeram Ramaswamy on Sep 21, 2007 03:36 PM   Permalink
Yeah. If we Hindus defend ourselves, we are communal elements. If we keep quiet we are secular? What kind of funda the "red devils" are propagating to us?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'BJP communalising Sethusamudram issue'