As per news, it is said in 123-PART and HYDE ACT of N-deal that India should help to USA in keeping their profits in international politics.
India can not oppose those decisions but have only one option > to support USA.
In other words , If USA will atack on Iran then ...India can not oppose but will have to help by all means of Petrol availability , base to american troops in india, their shelter ...all the things India should provide to USA without any comment ...
What my friends now wish to give more information ? Please give . we all are depending on NEWS in internet and in news papers. pl explain more in good words if i am wrong ?
I THINK , THATSWHY COMMUNIST AND BJP are opposing to this part of Deal as it shows slaveness of india in front of USA ...TRUE ?
RE:NOTE - 123 part of deal.
by Chanakya on Sep 21, 2007 12:45 PM Permalink
Krishna - may I know from where you got to know that India has to be an YES man for US once we sign the agreement? I would like to knowo more.... I never knew this
IT IS SAID by all communist party leaders in news papers.
i know that india will have many benefits after N-DEAL ..for example > direct flights from newyork to delhi / mumbai / Hyd / calcatta / benglore ...........
and many Industrialist will come forward to invest in indian market and in industry.
RE:NOTE - 123 part of deal.
by raj on Sep 22, 2007 01:18 AM Permalink
Krishna Arjun , Where in the world you cook up this stupid idea. You really think US is gonna push around India? They are not fools. India is a huge business market top of that we are a democratic nation. These are Communist fantasies. Dont be too narrow minded. Iran is not our problem. They are a going to be a international problem down the road. If they goes this level.
RE:NOTE - 123 part of deal.
by MOHAN PYARE on Sep 21, 2007 01:10 PM Permalink
Mr.Krishna Arjun, where is your imagination taking you? Have you ever looked at the world map? Iran is not our neighbour. We do not have a common boundary with Iran. The gas pipeline project from Iran to India has not taken off because it has to be routed through Pakistan and the length of the pipeline within Pakistan will be around 2600 Km. When Iran is so far off from India, why should USA use India as a base for attacking Iran? Saudi Arabia is near Iran and USA already has military base there. Since Saudi Arabia is a sunni muslim country and opposed to Iran which is a Shia muslim country, they will be too happy to extend all necessary support to USA. (Even that is not needed. If you look at the map, you will see that there is gulf of Oman on the south side of Iran. USA can take the warships there for attacking Iran. It was not possible in the case of Afghanistan because Afghanistan does not have access from sea). When USA was not interested in using India as a base for attacking Afghanistan, and they preferred Pakistan for it, where is the logic in they using India as a base for attacking Iran? Please talk sensibly.
RE:NOTE - 123 part of deal.
by Playful on Sep 21, 2007 01:18 PM Permalink
ALSO WHEN ALMOST 98% COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD WERE AGAINST THE WAR WITH IRAQ, INCLUDING FRANCE, STILL THEY DID, IGNORING UNO. DO YOU THINK, THEY NEED INDIA'S PERMISSION TO ATTACK IRAN?
RE:NOTE - 123 part of deal.
by Playful on Sep 21, 2007 12:50 PM Permalink
LET US ATTACK IRAN OR LET THEM ATTACK CHINA... APNE BAAP KA KYA JATA? WE WILL NOT BE THE PART OF ANY WAR. WE DO NOT WANT INVADING ANY COUNTRY. INDIA WILL CONTINUE THE GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH IRAN AS WELL. I DON'T THINK OUR FOREIGN POLICY WILL CHANGE DUE TO THIS DEAL.
RE:NOTE - 123 part of deal.
by Playful on Sep 21, 2007 01:09 PM Permalink
NO. BOMBAY HIGH IS NOT LIKE IRAN OR IRAQ. IT HAS LIMITED RESOURCES AND WILL BE UTILIZED IN A CONTROLLED WAY. ALTHOUGH INDIA CAN DEFINITELY SURVIVE ON HER OWN. WE WERE ANTI USA FOR SO MANY YEARS. WHAT DID WE ACHIEVE? RUSSIA DID NOT LET US PROGRESS MUCH. THEY HAD THEIR OWN INTEREST IN INDIA. WHAT IS THE HARM IN GOING WITH USA FOR SOME YEARS? ATLEAST WE WILL HAVE LESS TROUBLE FROM PAKISTAN AND CHINA.
