Are we Sure that technology/Science have achieved everything that it wants to achieve? If Yes, why are we having a R&D centers and Technological department. Are we sure that Archaeological Departments have discovered everything? If not then we should give the benefit of doubt based on the book(Ramayan) which existed long before modern science and Archeological departments. One thing I find strange is people are talking about RAM without talking about Valmiki. Do we have any proof of Valmiki? Probably the answer is NO, but still Ramayan exist! what does this indicate? This means absence of evidence is not the evidence of existence. Govt should first tell us who was Valmiki before raising any questions on RAM.
Regarding the no scientific proofs, Can anybody give us the proof that there was a scientific study done to check the existence of RAM?
RE:Absence of Evidence is not the Evidence of absense
by Navin Kumar on Sep 19, 2007 02:45 AM Permalink
Spirituality cannot be proved,researched or identified scientifically. Science and spirtuality are totally different. Forget about Ram or Valmiki, or Jesus or Mohammad. Can science even prove the existance of God scientifically. The crap that DMK has created is purely due to illiterate and ignorant people ruling the people. Science has its limit and should be used in its limits. Every1 knows that no God can be proved scientifically.
RE:Absence of Evidence is not the Evidence of absense
by Sandip Joglekar on Sep 19, 2007 06:17 AM Permalink
For DMK its a different motivation. Mark MK's words. He is calling the opposition to project as a larger anti-Dravidian policy. Elections are near... :-).
RE:Absence of Evidence is not the Evidence of absense
by Andy Louis on Sep 19, 2007 05:19 AM Permalink
It can.. just read Einstiens God plays dice..Einstien the most intelligent Scientist the world has ever produced was not an aethist. But it cannot be proven 'today' the form that god exists.
