RE:RE:this article . . .
by avinandan datta on Sep 15, 2007 01:31 PM Permalink
Unfortunately, I cannot. My faith does not allow me to ignore such articles.
RE:this article . . .
by Amal Prasad on Sep 15, 2007 01:51 PM Permalink
Athiest and Faith - What an irony? I thought that an athiest is a person who trust only the scientic evidence. Faith and belief are a matter of superstitions for him/her
RE:this article . . .
by avinandan datta on Sep 15, 2007 02:02 PM Permalink
at least you detected the irony man. There is another word. "sarcasm" look it up.
RE:this article . . .
by narender kumar atri on Sep 15, 2007 01:17 PM Permalink
Just because of people like you we hindus are always at the receiving end. Had this been a religious issue for the Muslims or the Sikh, the Govt would have never dared to give such an affidavit. People like you should be thrown out of this country.
RE:this article . . .
by faizan alikhan on Sep 15, 2007 01:30 PM Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .
