Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
How Christ born to Virgin lady
by gullapalli murthy on Sep 16, 2007 02:38 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

How can we confirm Hair at Hazratbal belongs to Mahummad?
How Christ is born to "VIRGIN "Lady?
Who wrote the bible?
What is truth in Mahummad's existance?
----------------
iSLAM AND cHRISTIANITY ARE FALSE NOT hINDUISM

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:How Christ born to Virgin lady
by ansar salman on Sep 16, 2007 03:07 PM   Permalink
History proves that christ born to a vergin becouse it is the historical fact that merry had neither married nor had the sex with any one to proove it their is a total history with exact dates. the existance of mohammed was also not a myth infact a history, which can be easily proved as for as hairs or nails are concerned few indianised muslims beleaves in those kind of indian myths of either hair or stories of a drunkun valmiky.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:How Christ born to Virgin lady
by ManLion on Sep 16, 2007 03:14 PM   Permalink
Hi Ansar, that's the myth propagated by people. Can you scientifically prove that mary did not have sex with any man. It's her word that one has to believe!!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:How Christ born to Virgin lady
by elumalai namboodri on Sep 16, 2007 03:34 PM   Permalink
Finally the answer to many qeries.
20 centuries and 14 centuries ago it happened.
Even Budhdha is having the chronology dating back to 26 centuries back.
But Ram and co can be dated back to 17 million years ago.
You ask a child, How much he ate?
It would be widened arms.
Children are equal to God,
Hence such mllion years ago can be accepted a divine.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:How Christ born to Virgin lady
by varshamadhav on Sep 16, 2007 04:11 PM   Permalink
christ was not born to any virgin neither he rose from dead. pope is just another political leader trying to protect vested interests of his country n church. christianity is a religion encumbered with contradictions galore between its principles n the actions of its followers over centuries.
mohammed was just a tribal leader who came out with some rules of living which suited only tribes of that era. the rules of Quaran r chauvinistic barbaric n most unsuitable for modern mankind.
hinduism is no religion at all - there is no established sect no written rules mandatory for people no undisputed religious leaders. ramayana n mahabharata r two beautiful pieces of literature just like lliad n odeyssey.

faith is the most stupid and illogical emotion man experiences n falls prey to - since we r inherently weak it's easier to assume life is part of a pre set plan of Bigger force n we have to just succumb n fall on its feet in life
- it makes everything easy to bear.
meanwhile clever men over centuries have exploited this weak emotion to the hilt. it will continue forever.
snakes n sun n cows as forms of Gods might get replaced by something more complex as science progresses but religions n its runners in collision with states, corporates n other exploitative forces will continue the exploitation of weak.
Rules of Nature!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:How Christ born to Virgin lady
by elumalai namboodri on Sep 16, 2007 04:27 PM   Permalink
Tell me please,
Ram was affectionate to Hanuman, Garuda.
The great leader was affectionate to animals and birds 17million year ago.
But for the last 30 centuries you were practicing untouchability, Sathi etc. etc
How the link was lost?
Or the Religion of Rama is somewhere in the world but notin India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:How Christ born to Virgin lady
by ManLion on Sep 16, 2007 03:11 PM   Permalink
Don, You also seem to be just copying questions that others have asked before. We materialists cannot comprehend the spirutual message embedded in the scriptures. Ramayan though may be dated variously, it is the date attributed to the written forms. Dates based on an analysis of astrological signs dates back over 100,000 years ago. Bharthavarssha was not just confined to the present India, it extended far beyond your imagination.
You, who has been brought up by brainwashed foreigners can't understand the greatness of hinduism and its ideals.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India