The govt has never dared to ask Christians for proof of Jesus, or Muslims for proof of Mohammad or Allah. Only Hindus are asked to provide proof. Next they'll be asked to provide Jizya. I am an atheist, but I don't like the Left-wing Congress govt imposing its firangi stamp on the nation. Clearly the fact that they are asking only some for proof and not others for it, is a statement of communal bias.
RE:Discrimination, Ugly Double Standards
by jarvis on Sep 17, 2007 06:02 AM Permalink
You fool, stick to the question and that is was Ram there and your own hindu brethen on the committe has said that he wasn't.
Stop blaming Christians and Muslims for your stupid mistakes and the missing away of your gods.
You have over 300 gods anyway so why worry if one of it is fictitious. Put a committee on the other 300 and guess what, none are existent.
BTW there are clear proofs of existence of just about all prophets in Christianity, judaism and Islam but goofs like you would never get that anyway.
RE:Discrimination, Ugly Double Standards
by beessmilla on Sep 17, 2007 08:07 AM Permalink
prophet mohd cheater of islam - Allah
by beessmilla on Sep 17, 2007 08:03 AM | Hide replies
Prophet mohd who cheated humanity and women in the name of allah.
Fact is he is a goonda,womeniser.To make his dirty deeds accceptable to society he payed allah trick and started telling what ever bad things he did he has done at the instance of allah.
he married a crawling baby sodomi-fakdomi and told allah has told
he married aisha 6 yrs baby and told allah has told.
in reality revealation are fabricated story of prophet moihd
RE:Discrimination, Ugly Double Standards
by Good Muslim on Sep 17, 2007 06:56 PM Permalink
Couple of facts.
1. Muhammad married a widow aged 40 when he was 25. He remained married to her until she died.
2. Muhammad re-married when he was 48 and most of his marriages were with older women either widowed or divorced. The purpose of the marriages was to form friendships between tribes who were fighting with each other.
3. Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 9. Again this was a norm in arabia at that time. Even today, in some deserts this is a norm. Also keep in mind that women in deserts mature early.
Reminder: Multiple marriages was a norm at that time. Muhammad was not doing an extraodinary thing by marrying more than one women.
But I do want to respond to your claim:
1. You called Muhammad as womanizer. What should we call Krisha then. How many marriages and affairs did he had?
2. What about Draupadi with 5 husbands. What shall we call that?
3. What about agni pariksha that sita had to give? Isn't that supressing chaste woman?
4. What about loosing draupadi in gambling? What shall I name the character of the pandavs?
5. What about devadasi traditions in temples. Shall I call it prostitution or worship.
6. What about Sati?
7. What is Lingum? Do you really worship that?
These are facts from your books. Please prove me that I am wrong.
Now I invite you to Islam, a religion that calls to worship Allah alone who created this earth and the heavens. If you don't accept the invitation you will end up in hell under a sever torment. Make
RE:Discrimination, Ugly Double Standards
by daimavane on Sep 17, 2007 01:00 AM Permalink
while I dislike hindu fanatics ,. I hate christinans who converted yesterday for single free tea or for a kilo of free rice and act like they have followed christinanity for 1000 years.. Shame on you.. Converted christians are the lowest lives I have witnessed characterwise.
RE:Discrimination, Ugly Double Standards
by jarvis on Sep 17, 2007 05:57 AM Permalink
They were hindus weren't they before they converted, no wonder you find them low lives.
Go and find your demi god rather than blame Chritians you fools.
Looks like he never came from banwas.....may be you fanatical hindus need a banwas 2.
