RSS psycopaths deny Muslims the right to live in land, though they ruled it for 800 years. But denying a Mythical king is denying india - Height of hypocricy
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by KISHORE on Sep 15, 2007 11:11 AM Permalink
DONT COMPARE RAM TO UR MUSLIM KINGS THIS COUNTRY BELONGED TO RAM UR JUST OUTSIDERS WHO CAME AND TOOK REFUGE IN THIS GREAT COUNTRY
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by narayan mundra on Sep 15, 2007 11:19 AM Permalink
also note that the muslim rulers only usurped our properties .... eg TAJ MAHAL which was a hindu temple , With their lullies cut , do you think they have any idea about architecture ??
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by riir on Sep 15, 2007 10:56 AM Permalink
using your logic all colonies of england, france, portugal etc around the world should invite their colonizers to live there. In fact THEY HAVE KICKED THEM OUT. SO MUSLIMS WERE ALSO COLONIZERS AND SHOULD BE GIVEN THE SAME TREATMENT.
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by balaord on Sep 15, 2007 10:58 AM Permalink
If Muhals were colonozers why all Indians revolted against British at the command of Baghdur sha of Delhi?
RE:RE:Ram -Denying India?
by riir on Sep 15, 2007 11:04 AM Permalink
because he forced them to revolt so that he can kick out the british and continue his tyranical rule. they didnt have a choice other than revolting or he would have killed them. So you are saying Mughals were friendly people who just arrived in India and the people led out a red carpet welcoming them to rule? are u a nutjob? mughals and muslims are outsiders. the muslim religion/culture/ is not ingenious to india. Its as foreign as the British were
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by m.d. rajendra jain on Sep 15, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
Read history. It was precisely a similar situation when the faith of the both hindus and muslim soldiers was insulted by the British that resulted in the Mutiny.
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by Marco Polo on Sep 15, 2007 10:57 AM Permalink
we didn't ask muslims to rule us.they came,plundered,looted,destroyed hindu temples,maimed our gods and godesses,ate and drank as gluttons as they had never had enough food from where they came,some of them married hindu women as muslim women of those days were ugly and useless.so what more should we give them? respect? never.we cannot give respect to such pigheads.
RE:RE:Ram -Denying India?
by balaord on Sep 15, 2007 11:01 AM Permalink
So you Majaority guys were simply crying for 800 years when minority Muslims did this ?is it? Are you not ashamed then? Does this sound logical that Minorities were presecuting majaorities for 800 years? Dont rubbish
See the historian Francis robisons view on Telegraph UK http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2007/08/30/borob126.xml
This sick theory of presecution is propgated only by RSS pyscopaths
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by Aravind Rajendran on Sep 15, 2007 11:22 AM Permalink
Listen...RSS is not India. We are not talking abt RSS or Al Queda, but about Indians and their faith, Hinduism, in particular. When Prophet's cartoon was released, one minister in India offered money to kill the cartoonist, the whole Danish government was ridiculed, in Afghanistan and Pakistan people were killed in riots. Alright. Bcoz they believe there was a human being called Muhammed who lived and became a Prophet and became their religion's identity. Here, we have "Ram" a diety of Hindu religion in a Hindu majority country and there is a bridge name in his name and Hindus want to stop the construction and the government says there is no scientific evidence that Ram existed. Tell me something, what would muslims do, if Saudi government says Mecca should be demolished bcoz there is no scientific evidence of "Allah" anywhere, so let's go ahead and demolished. What would happen ???????? The whole world would burn. Hey, let me ask this....why should everybody go rioting and killing around when their faith is questioned and Hindus should just sit and debate in forum. I am not instigating the Hindus to fight, I'm just saying that Hindus indifference shouldnt be taken as cowardice and we are not idiots. And yeah, by the way, the muslims built a beautiful grave (Taj) and it's our national monument. You see, we too are hypocrites. We Indians are sentimental idiots, we will talk like this when Ram issue or another issue happens, but we will cry for a muslim too when he/she faces a
faces a disaster. We are good people, just that we dont have a good head...as in a leader who can bring the flock together. Let's Hope. That should be the faith. Jai Hind !
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by Marco Polo on Sep 15, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
Oh,so did the Mussalmans come to their ancestral home to have a good time when they invaded us? What happened in their homeland.Did someone throw them out to India?
RE:RE:RE:Ram -Denying India?
by riir on Sep 15, 2007 11:08 AM Permalink
so you are saying that mughals were not foreign occupiers? What business did they have in India? How are they different from the British colonizers? They followed the same war/conquer/kill doctrine that Mohammed followed. Mohammed had no reason or moral right to wage wars to spread what he believed as true religion. He had no moral right to break stuff in the kaaba and take over the place. period.
RE:Ram -Denying India?
by Jagat on Sep 15, 2007 10:56 AM Permalink
The entity you so callously refer to as a 'mythical king' is worshipped as God and revered by the majority of the people of a nation called India. I am an atheist - I do not believe in any formal religion. But even I can see there is something fundamentally wrong in striking at the heart of someone else's belief system. Unfortuanately, you probably wont understang what mean.
RE:RE:Ram -Denying India?
by balaord on Sep 15, 2007 11:04 AM Permalink
hurting the sentiments of Hindus is definetky un warranted.But this Tarun Vijay goes beyound this and says Denying RAM is Denying India and that is not acceptable
