WE all learned that Ram , sita , Laxman spoke Sanskrit langauge and Ravana spoke Tamil.
AS per historical scientist Tamil is around 3000 years old and Sanskrit is around 2000 to 2500 years old. So ram probably existed around 500 B.C I intially thought Ram is 17 million years old which was wrong. Sky bridge engineering was at peak before 2000 years. Aceepted.
RE:New Theory of Ram
by ems nnn on Oct 09, 2007 07:42 PM Permalink
Historians date Tamil Brahmi scripts and early sangam works to 200 BCE only. So Tamil(not proto Tamil of Induz valley) is almost 2500 year old language according to them. Now sanskrit(Again not classical sanskrit) is as old as 3700 years according to historians. Now I believe that 17 Lakhs years ago both sanskrit and old Tamil as well as Gandhari,Magadhi (Prakrit-Indo European languages)etc existed. Thiruvalluvar was a disciple of sage Agasthya and lived many lakh years ago. So this explains our beliefs. Also there are no Aryans and Dravida races. The outcastes from Brahmin,Kshatriya,Vysya and Sudras became the OBCs and SCs (Chandalas) and many became foreigners (Mlechas). Remember Brahmins who violated the Sruti and smriti rules were excommunicated. In purans also there are lot of mentions of descendants of Kings becoming Mlechchas!!
RE:New Theory of Ram
by Ramasubbu on Oct 10, 2007 01:00 PM Permalink
Good attempt. Give me one proof of sanskrit's existence of 3700 years. Which script sanskrit used? is there single stone script for sanskrit, or seal what exists for brahmi in south india and in harappa.
Sanskrit is foreign language came to india which became valid very late. it is not figured among ancient languages.
RE:New Theory of Ram
by on Apr 15, 2008 03:57 PM Permalink
it is not brahmins who has re-written but the british who has written the history in order to divide the hindus in terms of aryans & dravidians...........poor ignorant people like u are still in darkness.As Swami Vivekananda said in his works that all the people in the indian sub-continent are Aryans.U r influenced by some mad old man like Karunanidhi who said RAM never existed just for votes of Non -Hindus............does he have any proof???????? Its a shame to a man who has his name called Ram & says Ram never existed,its just like saying as Ramsubbu never existed. Stop spreading ur wrong message about Vedas & its culture .just a glimpse of that ur whole life would be changed.Get a life Mr.Ramasubbu JAI SRI RAM RAM EXISTS IN THE HEART OF EVERY CREATURE,EVEN IN YOU.
RE:RE:RE:New Theory of Ram
by Ramasubbu on Oct 10, 2007 01:41 PM Permalink
Ems ji, can you help me with simple info, just tell me what was mother tongue or language of Ram and sita which they spoke? It will certainly proove their existence. I am only trying to make sure that Ram can really proven and world will not mock at us without any proof.
