Why some winners of election abuse selectively symbols of a major religion or sentiments of followers of a majority faith while they do not say anything blasphemous about other religions which are followed by minority in our country? The election winners have been hurt by educated followers of their own religion very recently branding them as belonging to BARBER's caste and by their looks and their lack of being modern for a long time. They have a good following in their region and most of them have the same hurt. So the election winners who have been supported caste wise feel they can do whatever is WRONG in their own reasoning. Every time some one says he has committed blasphemy he is emboldened to say more as he knows his design is working. Such people are downright cowards as they have sought more support of people belonging to other religions by giving them religion based reservation to get their supports increase. With their own evolution in linguistic literature they definitely understand that poor people from these so called ...castes deserve a better deal. Ideally human beings who are endowed with deep sense of leterature are highly sensitive. But why these ones are not? The hurt is very deep that if they are allowed to plunder the entire mass of the so called ... caste whether they are really responsible or not and get away with it they will definitley do it as the power has gone to their head and literature has not mellowed them down. Only possible change is their
RE:Political leaders
by Marco Polo on Sep 22, 2007 01:40 AM Permalink
If you say something against Hindu belief,then you are a secular(sickular) person.
