RE:If Ram defines India
by Amal Prasad on Sep 17, 2007 10:07 AM Permalink
Mr. Solo,
please do not mis-spell names that you don't no. I thing you are referring to lord Ganesh (aka Ganpati). It's true that Krishna, Ganesh, Shiva, Vishnu, Lakshmi, Durga and other 64000 gods influence our collective hindu pysche and there is no denying that without them hinduism would have been poorer, Lord Ram is the only one who was also a ruler, who extablishehed the standards of morality and responsibility. The first ruler in collective human history to defer to unjust wishes of the citizenery and in the process, committed an involuntary unjustice to his wife and two children. As a husband and father, he was aware of Mata Sita's innocence, but at the same time, being the ruler and judge, he cannot act as their witness and have to gave in to the unjust demands of the public - Something that is also a drawback in Demmocracy. It is not necesary that the decision of a majority is the right decision. If you want more information, you are welcome to contact me.
RE:If Ram defines India
by JB on Sep 17, 2007 10:31 AM Permalink
hello smart amal prasad...u said "please do not mis-spell names that you don't no"....well..if he doesnt know the names he's bound to mis-spell them...how can u ask him to spell correctly the names that he doesnt know??
RE:If Ram defines India
by JB on Sep 17, 2007 10:08 AM Permalink
Oh..no..dont start listing them....the list would be longer than this article and all the comments and replies put together... You'd probably need to request the census board of India to do a census...I wonder if there is a population clock for all the hindu gods...
RE:RE:If Ram defines India
by Jeffrey Mittal on Sep 17, 2007 11:37 AM Permalink
JB is purposely misspelling them as he intent is mockery.
jb, tell about the 4 apostles and the stories that don't fit with reference to the Jesus's resurrection. Why is there so much confusion and if one version is right then others are wrong.
Why is it so becuase then the whole crux of christianity would fall apart wouldn't it?
RE:RE:If Ram defines India
by linus on Sep 17, 2007 01:06 PM Permalink
JB you are a Non-Hindu Indian. So you must be a convert. Therefore your ancestors had probably been raped and abused. I understand your anger. Or perhaps you doubt you own lineage and don't consider yourself Indian and are frustrated about the same !! Poor fellow ...!! May your lord who ever he give you peace... :-).
