Whoever has wrote this, is either too ignorant or too sycophant. India was never identified by existence or non-existence of Ram.For those who do not know their history at all, let it be clear that Ram is only known to be one of the ten incarnate of Lord Vishnu. Therefore it is Lord Vishnu who is the supreme identity and not Ram. The BJP, RSS and all its affiliates are simply playing upon the sentiments of common man and nothing more. Unfortunately the author has also degenerated himself to that low level. he is nothing but one of the stooges of the communal forces that are trying to divide India on the basis of religion. But it should never be forgotten that India existed for centuries earlier before Ram came into existence and it shall continue to exist even if Ram is there or not there. Existence of Ram makes no difference to the existence of India. But for some communal minded freaks, Ram is only a tool to fulfill their own vested interest. People of India should not fall for these cheap antics.
RE:Denying Ram....
by Ram on Sep 16, 2007 02:05 PM Permalink
Agreed!!. But why only targetting the faih of Hindus. There are n number of Dargas and Mosques which are obstacles for road widening. The goverments don't even touch them.
Now, who is Communal Minded Freaks? What about the stupid governments who comes up with reservations on religious basis. What about the governments which want to count the number of minorities in Military.
I know you are a blind congress supporter. Come out of selective blindness and see the world around you. You are being made outsider in your own country
RE:Denying Ram....
by vivek bansal on Sep 16, 2007 04:41 PM Permalink
Dear Don, Please try to deal with hindus later,first try to stop uncle sam,currently crushing your loved ones every where,after that some energy is left,come to we hindus,we will show KISME HAI KITNA DUM.
We are not invaders,we love to live with peace and dignity,why donot you people try to follow that so this world will be peaceful and liveable for all.
RE:Denying Ram....
by on Sep 16, 2007 02:39 PM Permalink
Dear Gautam Yadav, Give me one instance in this whole article where the author is trying to divide the nation on communal lines. And please explain to me how being proud of one's God (or if you want, a mythological personality who has been elevated to godhood) and trying to preserve His heritage is supposed to cause communal strife? Where do other communities come into the picture at all?
