Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Anti Hinduism
by kumar kumar on Sep 15, 2007 01:47 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

The problem is that Karunanidhi is anti Hindu and anti Ram. Dravidians don't believe in Ram and Hindum gods. It is against their pagan religion. Karunanidhi and Christian Sonia from Italy are doing this mischief.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Anti Hinduism
by iluvtaj on Sep 15, 2007 01:53 PM   Permalink
yes if karunanaiddhi say that there was no Rama so how can TAMILIANS worship lord shiva, He was even more old???



The problem is not NORTH vs SOUTH, from last few years the problem is NOW ONLY TAMIL vs rest of INDIA.



KARUNANIDHI knows that his OPEN views about RAM will be pleasing to TAMILIANS.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Anti Hinduism
by AliKhan Mubbasher on Sep 15, 2007 02:01 PM   Permalink
Read VEEDAS and u may know that lord rama was there or not but I like to tell u in the light of VEEDAS only that existance of Prophet mohammad is there or not . This is all not to insult to any community. Plz its my request to my non muslim friends plz read VEEDAS before u comment any thing plz read that ur doubts will get clear. Shri Shri Ravi Shankar has admitted that prophet mohammed is mentioned in VEEDS and Ram is not mentioned .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:Anti Hinduism
by Madhu on Sep 15, 2007 03:34 PM   Permalink
Alikhan, what is beyond the limit of veda how one COMMERCIAL GURU Ravishankar can MAP his existance..Prophet Mohmd. was not GOD he was the paigamber means who carry the message of God.Why always we forget first we are Indian..then Hindu or Muslim.all Muslim are Hindu as Mohmd Gauri Converted them from Hindu To Muslim???? You know that if not Please go through new history leave Veda or ShriRam..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India