Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RAM SETHU
by venkat kumar on Sep 14, 2007 03:25 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

The withdarawal of affidavit means our GOVT AGRESS FOR EXISTENCE OF RAMA, RAMAYANA AND SO RAMASETHU ALSO. THEREFORE, IT IS BETTER FOR GOVT TO CHOOSE ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT AS SUGGESTED BY BJP AND SANGH PARIVAR FOR SETHU CANAL PROJECT WITHOUT DESTRUCTING SACRED RAMA SETHU, OTHERWISE WHETHER THEY WANT TO SEE ANOTHER BLOODSHED?. EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT THE PROBLEM, BUT BEST THE SOLUTION IS CHOOSE ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT WITHOUT DESTRUCTING SACRED RAMA SETHU.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:RAM SETHU
by Asdfgfasdfgf on Sep 14, 2007 03:34 PM   Permalink
A$$H@LE, They got scared that they will loose power and will be voted out.

You are so easily convinced. They have insulted us and we shouldn't forgive the b@st@^ds

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RAM SETHU
by Lalua on Sep 14, 2007 03:32 PM   Permalink
Venka ji,
Ignorance is blisss. That what you want to say. How would you make canal without destrying the Sethu. Please know the fact before shouting.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RAM SETHU
by venkat on Sep 14, 2007 03:45 PM   Permalink
Yes, you can by having a route thru Danushkodi which has already sunk. You should see the report first. For this route only, BJP gave sanction to the project in 2002.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RAM SETHU
by anil mahajan on Sep 14, 2007 04:32 PM   Permalink
Lalua Ji,
i think you are a super technical person. How much research have you done on the project. Better you keep your mouth shut instead of asking other people to do so.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Govt withdraws affidavits in SC on SSCP