I don't understand why gov't is backing out and withdrawing its affidavit. The facts found by the commision is based on the scintific and historic evidence and we have to accept the truth. I understand that it will definitely hurt the belivers/followers of RAMA, but for that we should not deny to accept the truth. If the gov't withdraws the effidavit submitted to the Supreme court, it will humiliate the honourable knowledgeable memebrs of the commission.
RE:I think gov't should move forward with the findings of the commission
by rajesh prasad on Sep 13, 2007 03:29 PM Permalink
Mr Molla you want evidence of something happened sometime 8000 year back or may be even more
Can you or any one of your community member provide any hard fact about the exitence of Muhamad... like his skull, bone, items, photo etc which can directly point to his existence let me remid you that u claim its so called existence which is not even 2000 yr old.
RE:I think gov't should move forward with the findings of the commission
by P2 Gore on Sep 13, 2007 03:35 PM Permalink
Abe ye modrator Hindu nahi hai kya? to phir ise ABUSE ka button kaha hai?
RE:I think gov't should move forward with the findings of the commission
by venkat on Sep 13, 2007 03:25 PM Permalink
Scientific and historical evidence cannot question the matter of faith. For example, jesus born to a virgin, resurrection of jesus, mohammad going to heaven to meet allah. The rock from where mohammad ascended is said to be present in Al-Aqsa mosque. Why protect that?
Please prove all these scientifically and historically rather than going thru gospels and quran.
If someone does not have a tomb for him and is cremated to ashes, does it mean ASI is correct?
RE:I think gov't should move forward with the findings of the commission
by AmarAkbar Antony on Sep 13, 2007 03:25 PM Permalink
Oh Atiar Moalla - Please show me the birth certificate of your Mohammad. Till that time Let There Be No Peace Upon Him (LTBNPUH) and not (PBUH).
RE:I think gov't should move forward with the findings of the commission
by sachin ray on Sep 13, 2007 03:25 PM Permalink
The destruction of Babri structure on Dec. 6, 1992 revealed many archaeological remains which irrefutably prove that Mir Baqi had incorporated parts of the preexisting temple in the construction of the Babri mosque. The remains include a temple bell, several intricate and detailed carvings, an image of Vishnu, and several other Hindu images. The principal amongst the findings however is a 2 ft wide by 4.5 ft long buff sandstone tablet 'SHILA LEKH' bearing an inscription in 'Devanagari' script and Sanskrit language. The 'Shila lekh' describes an ancient Ram Mandir existing at Ram Janma Bhoomi at least since the 12 th Century A.D. which was built by a Garhwal king Raja Govindachandra. The 4 th line of this 'Shila lekh' specifically describes a temple of Lord Vishnu (Hari) at the 'Janma Bhoomi Sthal'.The 15 th line describes it as a massive, magnificent temple dominating the landscape, and with steeples 'shikhar' adorned with gold 'Kalash'. The 17 th line specific- ally mentions the location as Ayodhya and the 'Saket Mandal', while the 19 th line mentions the 'Vaman Avatar' and then mentions Ram as the destroyer of evil Ravan. NET, IT WAS A TEMPLE!
RE:I think gov't should move forward with the findings of the commission
by Atiar Molla on Sep 13, 2007 03:37 PM Permalink
Dear Sachin, With due respect to your observations, I would like to mention that the commission is generally constituted with the most knowledgeable people of the field. I think before commenting on existence of lord rama they have considered all the evidences and facts. If they have not done proper exercise before making such controversial comments, it is not forgivable. I suggest you to gather all the evidences and challege the commission.
RE:I think gov't should move forward with the findings of the commission
by on Sep 13, 2007 03:25 PM Permalink
Do you have proof that Allah was existing? If Lord Rama was not existing, they why the hell the government is declaring holidays for Ramnavami? Dont treat hindus as fools.
