Good to hear about the withdrawal,but we still won't forgive the Congis.Whatever is in their minds spilt out;afterwards they thought about the consequences.Hence this withdrawal.
RE:Lord Rama given permission to exist by UPA
by Golden on Sep 14, 2007 05:24 AM Permalink
but now the good thing is at least every body knows that rama did not exist. even if the affidavit is withdrawn by force. now every man with honest heart will atleast think about this.
RE:Lord Rama given permission to exist by UPA
by Marco Polo on Sep 14, 2007 05:46 AM Permalink
Rama did exist,so did Jesus and Mohammed.They were given superhuman qualities in the Books,but they may have been men with godly qualities.As Hindus we worship such heroes and heroines and also the elements in nature.We are not ashamed,apologetic or doubtful as you may think.Infact it ia liberating experience to find God in nature and seeing God in every atom rather than thinking this is sin,hthat is sin,our God is the only God etc etc always fearful about the headcount of the religious community as practised by Semitic religions(Judaism is an exception).We are not askingg you to follow our path.
RE:Lord Rama given permission to exist by UPA
by kesireddy sreedhar on Sep 14, 2007 09:36 AM Permalink
When some one argue that Rama does not exist, then it's clear that no other mahatma or messengers does not exist in this world. It is like telling their fore fathers does not exist but they are true.
RE:Lord Rama given permission to exist by UPA
by Ramesh P on Sep 14, 2007 07:13 AM Permalink
So we know that Jesus was not son of god and bible was not word of god, and so we know that Koran as not a revealation of God, neither mohammed was taken to heaven by god.
