RE:Rama
by pradeep agarwal on Sep 12, 2007 01:38 PM Permalink
Why are you raising such a stupid query on an issue that is close to heart of crores of Hindus?
RE:RE:Rama
by rajeev nair on Sep 12, 2007 01:44 PM Permalink
Its not a stupid query Mr Agarwal.. If its in Thretha Yug, its almost 1.7 million years old.But no science tells us existense of human in this part of the woeld durinmg that period . Indus valley civilisation which predates Ganges settlement is less than 6000 years old. So if Rama existed then it should not be earlier than 4000 BC. And as per the archaeological evidence the sediment is 1.7 million years old.
RE:Rama
by Vikrant Athavale on Sep 12, 2007 02:02 PM Permalink
Dear Rajeev, Science also says that its man made and not natural. As for the Civilisation goes its over 5000 years old. Tamil language which is derived from sanskrit is over 4000 years old, may be you know something how old malayalam is.
RE:Rama
by rajeev nair on Sep 12, 2007 01:39 PM Permalink
No Rahul & Kabir, I didnt ask about your family matters.. I asked about Rama's living period ..
RE:RE:RE:Rama
by rajeev nair on Sep 12, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
Hi Vinay , I repeat i didnt ask you guys family matter ... And iam not surprised too.. RSS ( Rashtriya Suckers Sangh ) would have taught these moral values to you guys ..
