Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
sethusamudhram project
by Dragon Cares on Sep 13, 2007 07:44 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

These stupid/idiotic/lunatic/greedy politicians will destroy anything for their greediness. Our Hinduism dont need these politicians at all for it's survival; but these politicians need Hinduism for their survival. This is the hard truth. Apart from religious factor, there is also scientific/geographic factor that will prove this man-made/natural bridge linking between Rameswaram/Dhanushkodi and Srilanka has been existing for centuries and thereby protecting Tamilnadu's coastal areas from massive Tsunamy attack. These lunatic/stupid/idiotic politicians dont want to accept these facts and realities but very eager to destroy the natural gift. Instead of wasteing money on this useless project, better, we could use this big money to build state-of-the-art infrastructure which will help a lot for our economy.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
  RE:sethusamudhram project
by Vishnu Veni on Sep 13, 2007 07:50 AM   Permalink
But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth... did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie. Your belief determinse your destiny

Sometime back I read in Competetive Success, a magazine that many Group 1 exam takers prepare had secion on persons Past, mentioned Jesus 4B.C Budha ~500BC Mohemmed ~500AD there they showed Valmiki ~800BC and Vedavyas ~800BC as Sanskrit poets, who wrote stories, why didn;t this agitation takes place then? You lnow more thing Valmiki is contemperor of Ram as per Ramayana... how it is possible one who lived 170000years back and one who lived in 800BC can be contemperors? Is History wrong?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'