RE:Hiii
by Milind on Sep 13, 2007 04:52 AM Permalink
Hey...it negates the contention that it is a man made bridge. It says the formation of limestone shoals cannot be more than 3500 years old !!!
RE:Hiii
by Hyderabadi on Sep 13, 2007 04:57 AM Permalink
Hmm.. okay wiki was just for informational and it is neutral theory. I will not quote from it and i have not read it completely actually. sorry for if any confusion. but i sincerly believe one should not hurt ones beliefs and sentiments irrespective of any issue not just this.
RE:Hiii
by Milind on Sep 13, 2007 05:00 AM Permalink
True no sentiments must be hurt !!! And none are being by making the project. It's just a inflammatory headline from rediff not supported by anyone else in the mainstream media......so we must see it for what it is !!!
RE:Hiii
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 04:53 AM Permalink
It is a matter of faith sir.If the Govt can bypass destroying it,shouldn't that be done when millions of us have faith.And what on earth are they going to present India with having a shorter sea route to Srilanka?Let them do something for a shorter route to Kailas if they can or a shorter one to USA.
RE:Hiii
by Hyderabadi on Sep 13, 2007 04:55 AM Permalink
yes i agree one should not question the beliefs and sentiments of ones religion. Govt should stop the project. They will be able to find another route to make the bridge without destroying this
RE:Hiii
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 05:03 AM Permalink
Just the way,they kept away from hurting the feelings of Muslim men during thr Shah Bano case.
RE:Hiii
by rangdebasanti on Sep 13, 2007 05:01 AM Permalink
Mr Hyderabadi, I have all thr respect for you as a truth seeking human being. However, alike every single creature on this earth, who can not prove, whose offspring is he or she, but can not tolerate any abuse on his or her parents' name, the hindus can not and not at all can take any abuse on their God's name. ASI is a real fools' paradise and my suggestion to you, my dearest Islamic brother, is to stay away from this.
RE:Hiii
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
Rangdebasanti , I wounder the level of u guys.Do u think by hurting the majority Cong can win.Why the hell they will say this...This is a report from ASI and r hard scintific facts.I wonder most of u guys wanted to fool themself to leave in false hood..Just like u don't accept that Sanatan Dharam is the real religion for u .And God is shapeless according to Vedas.
RE:Hiii
by firefly on Sep 13, 2007 05:07 AM Permalink
two neanderthal monkey men named Neel and Angad who were expert thinkers decided to cut rocks in a particular volume so that they float on water. These huge rocks sustained the forces of waves and also helped the army cross the bridge easily.
Lanka in the epic and Lanka existing now couldnt be a coincidence right? at least be rational. NASA themselves had agreed that civilisation existed in SriLanka around 10000BC right?
Dont beleive in NASA too much. American government, Cocacola, Google are involved in a big scam of altering content on Wikipedia too. A hacker in the recent news had prooved it by his software.
NASA says"It says the formation of limestone shoals cannot be more than 3500 years old !!! "..right? Can they go back to the age 10000BC and proove it?
Can they proove GOD made humans and other beings? In the future they may say Aliens created us...will all religions take the crap then?
